SUPREME COURT.
CIVIL SITTING,
(Before His Honor Mr Justice Conollv.) The ease Harry Green v. Hum Hukunui and otheis, claim £62 10s, for work and labor done, and £IOO damages for breach of contract, came on at the Supreme Court yesterday. Mr R, N. Jones appeared for plaintiff. The defendants had not fi el a defence; Mr W. L. Rees desired to appear on behalf of the defendants, to consent to a judgment, but His Honor said that he could not permit him to appear at that stage. The claim arose out of a contract that had been stopped through the Validation Court refusing, after the Tahora case, to allow further money to be drawn. The plaintiff gave evidence, and judgment was given for £127 10s as arranged, with costs on the lowest scale. In the case Rawhiti Paerata and Apirana Kopua v. Fitzgerald Bros., claim £126, Mr R. N. Jones appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr \V. L. Rees (instructed by Messrs Rees Bros.) for the defendants. The plaintiffs set up a case that as partners they were to do three miles odd of fencing at £lO per mile. The defence was that the plaintiffs were not partners in the contract, and that it bad been arranged that the fence in question should be erected by Rawhiti alone, acting for his father Hone Paerata, who, it was alleged, had as his half share of the fence, agreed to find the posts and battens. The defendants acknowledged their liability for the labor of erecting, and paid into Court the sum of £35, which they said was a fair pi*ice after deducting a setoff of about £2B. His Honor found that the plaintiffs were not partners, and said he preferred the evidence of the Europeans as against that of the plaintiffs, but he said he would allow £6 of the set-off which had not been admitted, in addition to the amount paid into Court. The question of costs then arose, Mr Rees asking that no costs be allowed. Mr Jones contended that his clients were entitled to costs, and after argument His Honor certified to Supreme Court costs on the lower scale.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19020417.2.44
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume VII, Issue 392, 17 April 1902, Page 4
Word Count
361SUPREME COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume VII, Issue 392, 17 April 1902, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.