TOLAGO BAY COURT.

Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 219, 21 September 1901, Page 3

TOLAGO BAY COURT.

(Before Mr W. A. Barton, S.M.) CRIMINAL CASKS.

Ix tho ease of W. D. S. McDonald v. George Emanuel, in which the defendant was charged with unlawfully rescuing a horse which was being impounded, the accused was found guilty, and a fine of £1 and costs £7 10s was imposed. WORRYING SHEET. A native named Henry Rangi was charged on the information of W. F. Hale with having committed a breach of the Dog Registration Act by permitting a dog to startle a fiock of sheep on the road. He pleaded guilty, and was fined £1 and costs 11s, two days being allowed to pay the fine. STOCK ACT. For a breach of the Stock Act a native named Te Rawhiti Tarata was fined £2, costs £9 6s 6d. DESTITUTE PERSONS ACT. Under this Act-, on the information of Harate Eakaitapu, an order was made against Harry- Harding for the payment of 3s per week. CIVIL CASES. In the following cases, judgment was given for the plaintiff, with ..costs: — Albert P. Agnew v. Matenga Ixahu, claim ;'£s 10s, and costs £1 5s 6d; Same v. Mere Rangi, claim £3 6s, and costs 9s: Same v. Atarea Tipuna, claim £3 7s 4d, and costs £1 5s ; Same v. Hana Kariui, claim £1 Ss 6d, and costs £1 5s 6d ; Same v. Rawera Kornaru, claim £S 0s Sd, and costs £1 18s 6d; Sarah Trimmer v. Samuel Gilman, claim £6 4s 2d, judgment for plaintiff for £6 8s Sd, and costs £2 16s; Same v. Hana Kariui, claim £1 7s lid, and costs 14s; A. P. Agnew v. Wi Patene, claim £1 13s 6d, j and costs los; Same v. Wi Paka Kahure, j claim £T Ss, and costs 9s; Same v. Ivarauria, claim £3 9s 3d, and costs 5s ; Same v. Marehara, claim £1 0s 9d, judgment was given for 13s and costs 9s ; C-has. E. Smith v. Hana Kariri, claim 16s, and costs 9s ; Same v. Henry Rangi, claim 13s, and * costs 9s; George Dixon v. Renata Babington, claim £6, and costs £2 17s.

In most of the above cases Mr Lincoln Rees appeared for the plaintiff,