Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IS IT A LIE?

THE SPECTATOR’S STARTLING ASSERTION.

DENIED BY BANNERMAN AND HARCOURT.

By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyrighl London, Aug. 10.

Sir H. Campbell-Bannerman and Sir William Harcourt describe the Spectator’s statement that Cecil Rhodes contributed £SOOO to the Liberal election fund, on condition that tho Liberals should not withdraw from Egypt, as a lie. Tho Spectator asks for a better source of denial, the paper expressing belief in its authority for making tho statement.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010812.2.15

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 184, 12 August 1901, Page 2

Word Count
73

IS IT A LIE? Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 184, 12 August 1901, Page 2

IS IT A LIE? Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 184, 12 August 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert