Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SENSATIONAL DIVORCE CASE

MRS CONINGHAM DECLARES SHE WAS DRUGGED.

By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyrighi Sydney, March 13.

Under examination by petitioner, Sirs Coningham alleged that since tho last trial, whilo staying in tho country, she was drugged and hor letters stolen.

FORGERY OR PERJURY?

WHO WROTE THE LETTERS?

Received 10.59 p.m., March 13.

By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyrighi

Sydney, March 13. In cross-examination the respondent emphatically denied writing letters to petitioner, making arrangements, and giving him pointers in regard to the trial, which Mr Want had put in as evidence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010314.2.20

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 62, 14 March 1901, Page 2

Word Count
86

SENSATIONAL DIVORCE CASE Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 62, 14 March 1901, Page 2

SENSATIONAL DIVORCE CASE Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 62, 14 March 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert