Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FATAL BLUNDER

HITLER’S SOVIET PACT HOPE OF VICTORY LOST JAPANESE OPINION LONDON, Nov. 24. Hitler’s ill-considered Russian pact has destroyed the possibility of a German victory, in the opinion of Admiral Ryozo Nakamura, whom the Tokio correspondent of The Times characterises as “one of t'he clearest thinkers in the Japanese Navy.” The Times points out that Admiral Nakamura writes detachedly in Japan’s interests, his views appearing in a magazine entitled Pacific. He is also circulating a pamphlet with the evident intention of supporting the Japanese policy of neutrality. Admiral Nakamura emphasises the point that Britain’s potential enemies before the war were Japan, in the Pacific; Italy, in the Mediterranean; and Germany, in the North Sea, with Spain supplying bases for the Axis Powers, thus tying Britain’s hands. “But,” he adds, “the Russo-German pact instantly changed the situation. Japan and Spain chose neutrality, and Italy inaction. Thus Britain’s naval problem was reduced to meeting German guerillaism in the North Sea.” Britain Can Be Confident Britain can now be absolutely confident of victory.

Admiral Nakamura methodically examines whether air power can win. Answering in the negative, lie urges Japan to settle the China incident on the 'basis that the European war will be finished within a year. The correspondent points out that the institute does not propose ’ that Japan, in order to achieve her South Seas policy, should use the opportunities of the European war to fish in troubled waters. It only aims at peaceful economic expansion. The article expressed only the writer's view, the context showing tha't he favoured peaceful economic expansion. The institute desires it to be known that nothing is farther from the minds of its members than aggression.

The correspondent has reported a disclaimer 'by the Institute of the Pacific, a Japanese society, of views expressed in an article published in its official organ last week. The article said: —

“The South Seas (belong to the Far East, and Japan is entitled to a share in the wealth of these regions, which Europe snatched while Japan was isolated. It is sometimes proposed that Dutch oil be forcibly seized, but other methods can be tried at first.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19391130.2.60

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20108, 30 November 1939, Page 5

Word Count
357

FATAL BLUNDER Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20108, 30 November 1939, Page 5

FATAL BLUNDER Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20108, 30 November 1939, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert