Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO SURPRISE

SOVIET PROTEST NOTE CONTRABAND CONTROL BRITISH BLOCKADE PLAN ALLEGED NAZI PRESSURE (British Official Wireless.) Reed. Noon. RUGBY, Oct. 27. War and blockade were discussed in a leading article in this morning’s Times, which examined the repiy which the Soviet Government, after a somewhat leisurely consideration, has returned to British intimations to neutrals on September 6 and 11, of the imposition of contraband control.

The Soviet note was handed to the British Ambassador in Moscow late on Wednesday night.

The Times observed that the Soviet Government demur to the list of contraband goods prescribed on behalf of Britain is not altogether a surprise. The definition of contraband has been a constant subject to dispute between belligerents and neutrals, largely because a nation is no less apt to change its view of the law when it passed from one class into the other than is a private citizen to modify his opinion of the highway code according to whether he is at the moment a motorist or a pedestrian.

A message from New York states that the Moscow correspondent of the New York Times says that diplomatic circles believe that the note which the Soviet Government was yesterday reported to have sent to Britain declaring that the British contraband list violates the principles of international law, gravely impairs the interests of neutrals, and destroys international trade, was presented because Germany insisted, after the collapse of the “peace offensive” on the fulfilment of the agreement to consult anti act appropriately.

The- correspondent adds that the lame conclusion, harmless threats and claim to compensation seem to rule out bellicose intentions.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19391028.2.39.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20080, 28 October 1939, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
268

NO SURPRISE Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20080, 28 October 1939, Page 5

NO SURPRISE Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20080, 28 October 1939, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert