POLITICAL DRAMA

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20070, 17 October 1939, Page 2

POLITICAL DRAMA

GEN. SMUTS’ POWER the neutrauty^J^l SOUTH AFRICA DECIDES PRIME MINISTER’S DEFEAT The South African House of Assembly has known few more dramatic scenes than that of September 4, when the Prime Minister, General J. B. M. Hertzog, was defeated by his first lieutenant, General J. C. Smuts, and sacrificed his leadership in a vain endeavour to commit the Union to qualified neutrality in the war with Germany.

■lmmediately upon Britain’s declaration of war, the Union Cabinet was called upon to submit a policy to Parliament, and the crisis split it in two. General Hertzog made this known at the first opportunity, and, being unable to speak for the Ministry as a whole, he submitted a policy of his own, which had the support of five of his colleagues. Simonstown Naval Base Briefly, this was that South Africa should declare that her existing relations with the belligerent countries should persist unchanged as if no war: were in progress, but nevertheless that her undertakings to the British Government regarding the Simonstown naval base and her obligations, expressed and implied, as a member of i the British Commonwealth and the League of Nations should not be, affected. He also proposed that no one should be permitted to use Union territory for the purpose of doing any- * thing that might impair the Union’s relations with the rest of the Commonwealth. *i ■f-V;.;-.-....■. t: . , ; : i General Smuts countered with a; declaration that the .independence of; the'Union was a stake in the conflict,! and by 60 votes to 67 the House adopted an amendment moved by him that relations with the German Reich be .severed .and that the Union should

continue. co-operation with the Empire and take all necessary steps for the defence of its territory and interests. General Hertzog promptly resigned, find a new Government was thereupon formed by General Smuts. Clash of Great South Africans “The speech by General Hertzog this morning was a magnificent feat of oratory,” wrote T. C. Robertson, political correspondent of the Rand Daily Mail; “In my 15 years’ experience of listening to him I have never heard General Hertzog make a more inspired appeal. There was a stage in his address when I felt that it would require a superhuman effort by General Smuts to carry the day. “There was magnificent drama in the clash of these two great Sputh Africans, But then General Hertzog, for some unaccountable reason, .made the most vital mistake of his career. He started on a justification of Herr Hitler, and. his ideals. He went further, and compared his own struggle with that of the Fuehrer. “I saw the faces of his supporters drop suddenly. While there was a good case to be made for South African Nationalism, the fight for the .justification Of German Nationalism, ih the most brutal and aggressive ■form the -world has ever known, was meeting with no response. From being a South African patriot, the Prime Minister became an apologist for Nazism.” The Union’s Independence In the course of his speech, General Hertzog declared his unshakeable devotion to the principle that South Africa should not be plunged into war unless her own interests demanded it.

Sjie should not buy Britain’s goodwill at the cost of her independence. The present dispute was one with which she had nothing to dp and regarding which she had no obligations. The policy he proposed would enable South Africa to keep out of the war and yet fulfil her ’ obligations to the British Commonwealth. Among other things she would be able to resist any attack which might be made upon Simonstown. General Smuts, addressing the House, said he had wished to preserve the political co-operation of the past six years and more, but the questions now raised went to the very foundations of the national life. Vain Hope of Neutrality “The position we take up,” he continued, “is this: that it would be wrong, and it would be fatal, for this country not to sever relations with Germany at jthis stage. We think it would be wrong and it would be fatal for this country to consider Germany as a friend and to continue as if noth-, ing had happened in the world. “The question of our active participation in the war is a different matter. Thp situation in South Africa may be such —and I am afraid it is going to be such—that our active participation in the measure and degree of the last Great War will be very difficult. We shall have to look after opr interests in this country, and probably that will engage' all the resources; and effort of which we are capable.” |

The Prime Minister, General Smuts continued, wanted to be a friend, but; to temper his friendship with acts which no hostile Po.wer would ever recognise as legal or proper/ No, nation in the world —certainly not' Germany—would be under any obligation to respect such modified neutrality. .Was it not far better to adopt 1 a clear-cut line recognised by international la.w and usage, tha,t of sever-, ing relations with Germany and regarding her as an enemy? German Demand for Colonies The re-shaping of British policy was not merely an affair of Danzig and the Corridor; it was opposition to a pew force by which Germany was out to dominate the world. “What about this country?” General Smuts went on. “You notice that, thenext demand after Danzig has been wiped off the slate is going to be the return of the Gorman colonies. As far as South Africa and its special interests are concerned, the question j we have to face is what our position will be when we are treated as Austria and Czechoslovakia have been treated and as Poland is now being treated—when we are faced with a, superior force and have to surrenderwhat we consider .vital at the point of the bayonet. Facing the Foe Alone “Nothing would be more fatal for this country, poor as it is in defence and rich as it is in resources, than to dissociate itself, directly or indirectly, from its friends in the Commonwealth. It is not only a question of the loyalty and self respect which I assume we all feel deeply. If we dissociate ourselves deliberately and conspicuously from the line of action taken by the other members of .the Commonwealth, we are going to get/ what we deserve, and the clay will cofne—and it will not be far off—when' the same treatment will be applied to/ us. And when the day of trouble cotenes—and it is bound to come as surcjfy as v/e are seated here—when the f German demand for the return of'South-West Africa is made at the point of,the bayonet, we \vill §tand alone.”