Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AMERICAN VIEWS

“UNJUST GAMBLING” “BETRAYAL” OF RIGHTS BRITAIN NOT HELPED BLIND EYE TO FAR EAST (Eloc. Tel. Copyright— United Press Assn.) ORccd. July 20, 9 a.m.) NEW YORK, July 25. Commenting on the Anglo-Japan-ese agreement, the New York Herald - Tribune says: "There will be much unjust grumbling in the United States about the betrayal o£ the white man’s rights and also China’s rights under international guarantees. "It must be remembered, however, that such grumbling will come with poor grace from this country, which has given Britain absolutely no encouragement to defend those treaty rights with which ours are bound up, or reason to believe we would champion our common rights if the European situation were abruptly to demand the concentration of all Britain’s strength o n her own doorstep. If file agreement leads directly to the serious discomfiture of our people in China, we must reflect that the Administration has studiously kept a blind eye to the Far East.” "Belligerent Rights" The New York Times comments: "Britain has virtually granted belligerent rights to a nation which has not declared war. The Japanese have scored a diplomatic victory. If they declared war,- the United States, one of the principal sources of sup ply, would be bound to clap down the arms embargo. Through the British concession, it is now enjoying the best of both worlds. “It is unfortunate that Mr. Chamberlain's two statements in the House of Commons (on the Tokio agreement and Mr. Hudson’s peace plan) had to coincide. Signs of yielding on one’ front to strengthen another are understandable, but signs of yielding on two fronts are disquieting.” No Similar Agreement Tlie consensus of opinion in Washington is that the United States does not intend to make an agreement similar to that between Britain and Japan. It is stated that American policy will continue unchanged, although the situation will be studied carefully .to see what Japan’s attitude to foreign interests will be now.

Senator Hiram Johnson commented: "If the United States had followed Britain’s Far East policy we would have been left holding the bag. The situation parallels that when Mr. H. L. Stimson endeavoured to halt Japan’s conquest of Manchukuo.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19390726.2.41

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 5

Word Count
362

AMERICAN VIEWS Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 5

AMERICAN VIEWS Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert