Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fine Distinctions

In former days when theft was a capital offence, lawyers got busy and brought forward all sorts of very fine distinctions as to what was, and was not, theft, said-Mr. Justice Blair in the Palmerston North Supreme .Court. It had been held that an embezzler was not a thief, but nowadays he was only an ordinary common or garden thief. In former days he used to be a sort of high-grade thief. “Nowadays,” added His Honour, "we have got rid of all that fancy stuff.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19390726.2.23

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 4

Word Count
87

Fine Distinctions Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 4

Fine Distinctions Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 19999, 26 July 1939, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert