THE CENSURE DEBATE.

Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 1 November 1901, Page 4

THE CENSURE DEBATE.

[PER PRESS ASSOCIATION —COPYRIGHT.]

Melbourne, October 31,

In the vote of censure debate Mr Thomas moved an amendment in favour of direct taxation in the shape of a land value tax.

It is believed that both revenue and prospective duties are bad, A direct tax would be equitable and cost little to collect and stimulate employment. He trusted that not a penny teyond the amount required would be raised, A ■Denny land tax throughout the Commonwealth would vield £140,000,000. From narcotics and stimulants they could get four millions and have to raise though the customs in a general way another £1,400,000 He would bo prepared to support whichever side, moved for a reduction in tdxing the masses and primary industries. The censure debate is proceeding. Government intend, if possible, to bring it to a conclusion before the House rises, but there is ho prospect of a division before morning. , . A Government majority is assured. The estimates range from 13 to 15. Three Queensland labor members with Free Trade leanings, are the latest converts on the Government side. The Kanaka Bill promises to be a significant factor. Throughout the debate no member or supporter of the Government defended the tariff entirely, and all foreshadowed modification in committee, where the Opposition determined to fight every point,

Mr Barton said that he would not say tljat at no time would a land tax not be raised by The Commonwealth, but this time they must adjust taxation so as to leave the States the capacity to raise themselves any shortage resulting from the Commonwealth tariff. , a;