Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE APPEAL COURT.

[Pee Pbess Association.] Wellington, July 3. The Appeal Court was engaged hearing a point raised iii the Mabin case, whether the Criminal Code Act abolished criminal libsl.

Bell argued for the Crown that the indictment could be maintained under the English statue known as " Lords Campbell's Act."

Mr Hindmarsh for the defence contended this Act morely provided different punishment, and did not create a fresh statutory offence. Judgment was resarved.

H. M. King v. Banna'yne and Co.— A preliminary objecton was taken that tho Crown had not given security, but the court were unanimous that this was not necessary.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19010704.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 4 July 1901, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
102

THE APPEAL COURT. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 4 July 1901, Page 3

THE APPEAL COURT. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 4 July 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert