THE CASE OF BROOKLET.
In this case (according to a Napier paper) Mr Quinlivan states that in 1894 an agreemont was entered into by both parties, giving Brooklet to Quinlivan until such rime as ho (Quinlivan) considered she wus no longer fit for racing, when ha wan to hand her over to Mr Douglas who wanted lieu for brood purposes- Dnrinß such time as she was in Quinlivan'a possession he was to pay all racing fees and accept responsibility for (or all expenses incidental to training. Quinlivan was also to appropriate ail stakes won by tho mare in racing. These conditions plaintiff claims were complied with up to January lust year after Brooklet had won the Flying Handicap at Danevirke. At the time stated Mr Douglas approuched Quinlivan and informed him that he whs entitlrd to a portion of the money won by thfi mure, and it was finally decided that Mr Douglas be allowed 25 per cent upon the gross winnings. Before the Wellington Cup meeting Mr Quinlivnn alleges that defendant removed from his paddock the mare Brookler, with out the sanction of plaintiff ond ran her in the Wellington Cup later thus committing a breach of the agreement.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18960206.2.15.4
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume XVII, Issue 183, 6 February 1896, Page 2
Word Count
200THE CASE OF BROOKLET. Feilding Star, Volume XVII, Issue 183, 6 February 1896, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in