Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION.

TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAB. Sib,— My Prohibitionist friends have a passion for calling things by wrong names. Hence Prohibition, which is the very opposite of temperate, is misnamed by them the temperance movement. A reference to their lexicons would show - them that the name is a misnomer when so used. Mr Cocker repeats this misuse of terms wheft be talks of charity in connection with Sir Robert Stout, whose name, I woald remind my friend, was first intro* dueod by himself into this controversy. Is Mr Cocker so utterly destitute of -, Scriptural knowledge as to seek to cover by the word " charity " an act of gross disobedience to his Lord and Master ? - Has he not read that "to obey is better than to sacrifice, and to barken than the v fat of rams," and that "rebellion is as ' - - the sin of witchcraft, and stubborness is as iniquity and idolatry?" Does he not know that it wa*s the inspired Apostle, not me, who asked the latitudinarian- - Corinthian of " What concord hath Christ * ' with Belial, or what part hath he that • believeth with an infidel ?" What right . has Mr Cocker and his Christian friends to insnlt the majesty of God, and wound the consciences of thousands of the true* hearted followers of Jesus by giving the right band of fellowship, as well as the leadership of their pet scheme, to one who is the avowed enemy of our Saviour, . under the false, yet specious, pretext of , Charity ? Has it ever occurred to my x friend that Jesus was called by the Pharsees and Sadducees of His day the * Friend of Publicans and sinners. It is ' true that the publicans of the period were not liquor vendors, but they* were a despised and hated class, no doubt chiefly through the agitations of the above-named sects, who, though so care- , > f ul in carrying out their own fads and fancies were notoriously careless of God's commands. With this class feeling Jeses had no sympathy whatever. On the contrary, He more than^oncejcqm v , pared favorably the despised Publicans with the self-righteous Pharisees. I must say that the language and bearing of the. Prohibitionist toward the the liquor publican is not creditable to them 'as , professing Christians, being , altogether unlike the spirit and language, of their Lord and Master. , ■, % " Which of the two is the greater evil and which, of the twain is the biggest dinner— the man who openly advocates an infidelity — who teaches that the God of Scripture is a myth and that the fall, redemption, resurrection and the bless* ings of the future state contingent on the acceptance of the saving work of the Cross are fables, or the man who vends Alcoholic drinks subject to police con- '- trol ? My friends, like the Pharisee of / old, while straining at a gnat will with* > out hesitation swallow a camel. Has Mr Cocker and those acting with him forgotten the awful results of the teachings of that so-called philosophy, of which Voltaire d'Alembert and Diderot . were the chief exponents, and which - bore the bitter fruit of national apos- ~ tasy and wholesale slaughter. These men, however, in justice belt Said, did not for a moment anticipate such fear-, ful results to their labors, bat they sowed broadcast the seeds of infidelity,^ and this was, the fruit thereof. Sir,. Robert Stout privately may^ be, and no doubt is, the possessor of some good natural qualities, but it cannot be dembd , that he has used both his means i^d abilities in attempts to overthrow' theChristian faith, and the awful results - will be seen on the Great Assize Day. , '. I tell Mr Cocker that their alliance with the man who denies the God of the . _ Scripture and the Christ of Revelation cannot be covered by the term chanty. To my mind (and without desiring to offend more' than faithfulness demands) - it is a surrender of Christian principles in a bad cause, asdi the word treason > to the Lord mpze nearly expressorth* nature of the compafcfc between "Sir Robert Stout and my "friends the Chris- , tian Liquor Prohibitionists. , 'n I am, &c., * - J. B. Boots. -1' ',

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18951204.2.28.1

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XVII, Issue 133, 4 December 1895, Page 2

Word Count
689

PROHIBITION. Feilding Star, Volume XVII, Issue 133, 4 December 1895, Page 2

PROHIBITION. Feilding Star, Volume XVII, Issue 133, 4 December 1895, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert