Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE SHOP AND SHOP ASSISTANTS' ACT.

TO THE KD I TOR. OF THE STAR. Sir,— The gross absurdity, arbitrary nature, and injustice of this Act could not be more clearly pointed out than by the following supposititious case, which is not unlikely frequently to occur : — A man with his wife and family reaches home after a long journey at 1.30 p.m. on a statutory half-Jbolday. All of them are very hungry, and there are no provisions in the house. He sends three of his little girls, one to the butcher, another to the baker, and the third to the grocer, for a supply of meat, bread, and tea, while his wife goes to the butter and egg dealer for a supply of butter and eggs, but they all returned empty handed, with the information that they were refused to be supplied on the ground that the butcher, baker, grocer, and butter and egg dealer, all feared a prosecution and a penalty of £5. Now the excepted trades under the Act (that is, those whose owners are not compelled to observe the half-holiday) are •• those wherein is carried on exclusively one or more of the businesses of a fishmonger, a fruiterer, a confectioner, a coffeehousekeeper, an eating-housekeeper, or the keeper of a book stall at a railway platform." (I suppose this quotation from the Act is strict grammar, but who ever heard of more than one business of a fishmonger, fruiterer, confectioner, coffee-housekeeper, or eating-house-keeper, being carried on within the same premises.) Thus, though a man may improve his mind at a railway platform, or gorge himself with unwholesome pastry at a confectioner's, he will be unable on a compulsory half-holiday to purchase a loaf of bread, or a chop or steak, to say nothing of butter and eggs, however hungry he may be. I have no doubt there are persons who will carp at this letter as having overdrawn tbe probable effects of this abominable Statute but I am quite prepared to uphold that my remarks respecting it are perfectly justifiable. I am, etc., Saml. Goodbeheeb. Feilding, March 9th, 1895.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18950312.2.27.1

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XVI, Issue 215, 12 March 1895, Page 2

Word Count
350

THE SHOP AND SHOP ASSISTANTS' ACT. Feilding Star, Volume XVI, Issue 215, 12 March 1895, Page 2

THE SHOP AND SHOP ASSISTANTS' ACT. Feilding Star, Volume XVI, Issue 215, 12 March 1895, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert