Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Feilding S.M. Court.

THIS DAY. (Before Messrs Sherwill and Carthew, J.P.'s.) Thomas Jones and John Sangster were charged by the police with having committed a breach of the peace at Birmingham on Wednesday, March 14th. Mr Sandilands appeared for defendants, and Constable Tuohy conducted the case for the prosecution. Edwin Sanderaan, deposed : Was a solicitor residing at Birmingham, and was Secretary to the Birmingham Town Hall Company ; was sent for about 11 o'clock to go to the Hall, in the interests of the Company, as a •stone had been thrown through the window, and " crackers " were also thrown in ; the committee of the dance (which was being held at the time) gave him the names of nine persons who were said to have been the cause of the disturbance ; saw that a stone was thrown through the window ; did I not see accused take an active part. Cross-examined : There might have been a dozen other persons present. C. Grantham deposed: Knew defendants, who were present on the night in question ; was inside the porch of the Hall at the time the fireworks and flour were thrown ; saw a bag in Sihgster's hand ; was in the porch when the stone was thrown in ; had it struck the lamp it would prob ably have caused a fire ; there was some obscene language used ; knew the ofience was committed, but could not say by whom. By the Bench : Did not see defendants commit the oft'ence. A. J. Asliton, deposed : Was ;it the Hall between 10.30 and 1 2 o'clock on the evening of the 11th instant: saw both defendants there; a bundle of lighted crackers was thrown into the Hall, but could not say who threw them. Mr Sandiiands asked the Bench to dismiss the case without hearing the defence, as the evidence for the prosecution was so weak. The Bench dismissed the cases, but warned the defendants that they (the Bench) were determined to put down larrikinism and should a conviction be obtained the guilty persons would be severely punished. The Court then rose.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18940319.2.9

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 267, 19 March 1894, Page 2

Word Count
342

Feilding S.M. Court. Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 267, 19 March 1894, Page 2

Feilding S.M. Court. Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 267, 19 March 1894, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert