Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Woodville Libel Case

(PER PRESS ASSOCIATION.} Wellington, December 3. In the Supreme Court yesterday, the Woodville criminal libel case, Clark v. Haggen, was mentionod. Mr Jellicoe asked the Chief Justice if it was necessary for the prosecutor to appear, seeing that the case had been settled by the parties. His Honor said that "had nothing whatever to do with the Court. The prosecutor had set the criminal law in motion and he had been bound over to present a bill. If he did not do so his recognisance would be estreated, unless he was able to show why it should not be. Criminal law was not to be made use of in oTder to obtain a civil remedy. That would be an abuse of the Court. Mr Jellicoe aaid that with His Honor's permission he would mention the case again.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18931204.2.25

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 132, 4 December 1893, Page 3

Word Count
141

The Woodville Libel Case Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 132, 4 December 1893, Page 3

The Woodville Libel Case Feilding Star, Volume XV, Issue 132, 4 December 1893, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert