Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Sequel to an Elopement

• ■• A case involving somewhat peculiar •circumstances was. dealt lately; in ihV Sydney Supreme^ Court. , A man d'n'aniedArthur Nightingale sought to c^obtain a writ of ha b'e'aa corpus to com jpel Joseph Lawier and his wife r to ydehver up his ,- daughter, "^•Jessie Sinclair ..Nightingale, a child ; ,=aged six years. 7 Tbe, facts set out an JSLrs Lawler's affidavit" went to show -that in May or Juue, 1889, two per•s*ißonß': representing" themselves as Mr "•and Mrs Watson, rented a house from - - *her- husband, ( • and, desiring subse■quently tooproceed to Adelaide, Mrs -Watson arranged to leave her r«(i\ughter-Jesßie'-with-' -Mrs- Lawier for oy&aree months 'for, £6, -V which amount r?"was paid-in >advarice. 'She-next heard A'otthe Watsons dn-om* -Johannesberg, ASouth Africa^ and ..in an^early com•tuuuication chey enclosed £7- 10s as an dA3dditionan*cimtFibufeion -to the main- .— '■ teiiau.oe of tlhe. child. .ySince 'then, ; Although several letters were received, V>no fuithei* remittance -had been for■"warded. In January last the .present Aa'pplicantcalled' upon theDawlers and ; -informed them 1 that th'e;child was his, ° «aWddthat" afaout Vtwq years ago . his '■wife eloped from dCooktbw'n with Wat--^son, r who was -a-barber, -and -that : he d -Jh^d -since been spending all his time ~fandihuch of' his" means in searching daughter. ? -He ; asserted that vthe v Lawlers"ihad refused to give the ■ child to him,— but this they denied, .^nd-statedythatrwhenr applicant called 'upon them a promise was made in his behalf thatthe -would -furnish an -affidavit to assure them of his bona :fides, and "als6_pay the arrears due fpr • -the girl's r board and ; lodging. His /Honor ordered the .child to be given yiijAto the parent, , hut allowed no <cWts, as he considered, that respond- • -ren is Were not to. blame, and applicant <dwaa hot sufficiently to blame to "justify >hun in ordering;. him to pay the costs. transfer pf the child ih the vesti--V Ii vie bf the ' court was ~ not affected -without considerable difficulty, but 'the order was" eventually obeyed. — llJunedin Star.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18910321.2.32

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 115, 21 March 1891, Page 4

Word Count
323

Sequel to an Elopement Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 115, 21 March 1891, Page 4

Sequel to an Elopement Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 115, 21 March 1891, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert