Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Correspondence

THE QUESTION OF FOOTPATHS. : TO THK EDIT R OF THE STAH. Sin,— l consider as the names of certain property owners are mentioned in connection with this footpath in Grey street, there ought to be an explanation offered, so that the general public should not arrive at wrong conclusions. The fact is (which your correspondent should have stated) that each property-owner has to pay half the cost for this work, which is going to be done by the Council, and I I think I am correct" in saying that the same offer was made in the case referred to in Manchester street, but was refused by the property •■ owner in question. — I am, &c, Property-Owner in Grey Street.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18910312.2.5

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 111, 12 March 1891, Page 2

Word Count
119

Correspondence Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 111, 12 March 1891, Page 2

Correspondence Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 111, 12 March 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert