The Referee Appeal Case
"I , ""> >! Chbtstchuhch, February 3. Justice Dennis ton to-day issued a prohibition forbidding the Evident Magistrate from proceeding further in the case of the conviction of Messrs Selig and Bird, proprietors of the Heferee, who in October last, were fined £30, or three months imprisonment, for -a breach of the Gaming and Lotteries Act by taking money to invest on the _ totalisator, but not doing so, presumably paying totalizator dividends on horses which won. -The judge said that there was no .evidence that the money had not ' been put on the totalisator, though Selig and Bird had not done so themselves, and the evidence in the case was not consistent with their having contrived a scheme of betting totalisator odds.' Probably, however, the money had- not been put on the totalisator, but that; though a fraud, would not affect their clients as long as Selig and Bird were solvent. He would not give costs against ttu magistrate. ' It was contended that an application' for prjhibition on)} applied where the magistrate hac exceeded his jurisdiction, but Mi Denniston considered it applied' t< other cases, though he would lik< the point settled by a higher court.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18910207.2.15
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 97, 7 February 1891, Page 3
Word Count
197The Referee Appeal Case Feilding Star, Volume XII, Issue 97, 7 February 1891, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.