The Moan Will Case
,( MR iwiTED >BBBS ASSOCIATION.) [ -Wbluhgtow, This Day ; Mr Haggett continued his. argument in the will ease. to-day. He stated a number of objections to the validity of the second will, the chief being there was no evidence Renata intended to deprive Broughton nf an interest in ihe propertythat the will was in Amha's ewn writing in her own 3 favor ; that the. attesting wit* nesses were her friends- 'and -Renata's *nemie»^ that he made hjsmark instead of signing the will, 'owing :to;.weafc state s that no one present at the signing made any mention of the first will } that Airina refused to allow a lawyer to draw up a legal instrument in place of nefwill, andthat neither Broughton nor Haretu, who fe were watching saw the -attesting; witnesses enter sick chamber. Counsel is now quoting authorities.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18881115.2.11
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume X, Issue 68, 15 November 1888, Page 2
Word Count
140The Moan Will Case Feilding Star, Volume X, Issue 68, 15 November 1888, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.