An Important Will Case
In the Chancery division the other day was decided the case of Berens v. Berens. The late Mr Henry Berens, of Edgbaston, Jewish merchant, by his will settled large fortunes upon his daughters, and by a codicil stated his wish was that his daughters should forfeit their fortunes if they should marry out of the Jewish faith. It was stated that one of the young ladies was engaged to a gentleman of high professional position, who was not a Jew, and the question therefore arose whether the testator's restriction could be set aside as an illegal restraint on marriage. Mr Justice Chitty said partial prohibitions were contained by way of conditions, which were what were called conditions subsequent — that is to say, conditions which followed the gifts made; and there were no gifts over in the event of the condition being broken, then the law was that such prohibitions were empty and nugatory, and in terrorem only. The present case fell within the rule of law, and the declaration of forfeiture was inoperative.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18880710.2.20
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 146, 10 July 1888, Page 3
Word Count
177An Important Will Case Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 146, 10 July 1888, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.