Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Rival Road Boards

Ratepayers in the Manchester Road Board District will remember that at the last tneetmg of the Board a sum of £20 was voted to be expended on the Bunnythorpe-Aorangi road, conditional on a similar sum being expended by the Manawatu Road Board. In another column will be found an account of the manner in which the proposal was treated by the latter Board, when a deputation waited on them for the purpose of urging the necessity for the works contemplated. It will be eeen that while the Board sympathised with the deputation they were — they said — wholly unable to grant their request. We have read the annual balance sheet, as published in the Manawatu Daily Times, and, if one may be permitted to form an opinion as to the financial position of the Board from those figures, the members of the Board could hare done nothing «tae than refuPb the request. Tnej have sot Ui'e xuoaej.

As to the members of the deputation refusing to pay their rates, that was no doubt said in the heat of the moment, as each one must know the rates can be recovered by process of law. This state of affairs, so unpleasant to settlers on the road in question who hare for so many years paid rates for which they have not had the slightest return, will tend to make the ; feeling stronger on their part to detach i themselfes from a Board which has i treated them so scurvily ; but, on the other hand, the ratepayers of the Manchester Road Board, whose con- , sent will hare to be obtained before , the proposed annexation can be made, I will need to be satisfied they are not j to be saddled with liabilities they had , no voice in creating, and from which j the portion to be annexed has not [ received one farthing of benefit. This is a point which will have to be made j

very clear.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18880414.2.6

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 109, 14 April 1888, Page 2

Word Count
328

The Rival Road Boards Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 109, 14 April 1888, Page 2

The Rival Road Boards Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 109, 14 April 1888, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert