Feilding R.M. Court

Feilding Star, Volume IX, Issue 2401, 11 August 1887, Page 2

Feilding R.M. Court

£j /Waft Esq., EM.) "/:'■) j , '■ ■ Constable Meeha^-r. W. Watts, A. Parr, F, Saywell. J Constable MeehafrHMtia he would like to Bay he would withdraw the. informatioif if a smtable'SgbTo'gy were made and costs paid* Mr Staitej wi*9 appeared Jfbf defenclants declined as he was able to prove On being charged ! they pleaded not guilty. ■— -^ 1 TSusl cgse wsas held ovejf untilithe civil cases wgrf disposed of . f* fea&ia Jrosa A -9sl?So*XiftfcW*V-/i,:L ''i F. E. Jackson f*. Nils BeMOMt.— Claim £28 fla 7d MiGbodbehere for Iplaintiff.v <v ; '.tuv ■. >■'■■ -'■'■■ ■-■'< •- •f.-.'tl H. L, SHeHriU proved the claim which was for balance of a promissory note* ::i':.:-:-;f'> r^mri .r-f -/1 ..n1-lr*/ ■■ ' " Mr Carr also' gave evidence. : i A letter was ;rea^ : from > plicitor of defendant, Mr Tf atikins, asking for time. ■ , .'.ay, ..•.>;, „dv, ' - ' . . Judgment for plaintiff with costs £4. „ Kiptpn , and ourtis ;. y>- Ily> Munro, higU^d pip^r.rrr:(^^m[£l,f ) 3%~ ll {; ; Judgment for plain^ff w^m costs 7s. Charles "Hehrjr r. ' Fv Tuckey.— Claim £1 8s 6d. Mr SandUands for phiintrtt. ' ' ' J J r"' : '- V plaintiff 16s. ■ ; :;'JSame Vy^it&^pO^ f»- 8a 6d. Juagmiit Jfor plaintiff for £5 Os 6<J ?1 with oq^ 84a. Defendant asked ■for tiin^. an ojeii judgment was 'given. In the caseof Hawie v: HarshaQ and Copeland, Mr Hankiiis applied for an adjourantentr Mr Staite, who appeared for objected. Case adjourned. The question of costs 'wouldbe decided When *be case was heard, -^"--r-r* *•; \.A,:^i i < s-oo - ■ G. A. Frederick t. 8. t T. FitzHwr-bert-^Claini M 16s lOof, being refund of property tax. Mr Ihrior for plaintiff and Mr Goodbehere for .defendant. The f defence was,, defen* 'dant should not have ' been Itiuft s> ! parW'io the suit als he WaM only aftbW ney for Chatfes BiU: I '■; *>*'■* Mr Prior admitted so far. Buth* contended that "Section 9 of the Property Assessment Act, 1685, met the ; Mr Gbodbehere having replied, a A nonsuit Was entered With «ost» against plaindffi^^ r ;i Trustees of Court Loyal Feilding (Messrs Bray, BHderbeck, aud Mao arthur) A.O.F. v. E. Brown.— Claim £ 1 47^"2d; : Mr ■Sandilands-foS-plain-tiffs. This was an action brought under the Friendly Societies Act, 1882, to recover certain fees and contributions.' r :-:!: ■■'■■■ ■■■^.'- : .--J J! -.T- ; :I/f : T. W. Xi Foster, secretary of the Court of Foresters, jnade an affirmation and deposed : Kuew defendant in the (case; who-; was a suspeqde^ member of the Court Loyal ; he produced the register ; the clajim was for balance of contributions j had applied , for paysrent and a sum of ISa wa» paid to Mr Bray on account j had received noTnotice in accordapcejwith Bute 32 or the Local Lawa, "and I*sl of the General Laws, that def endanfe djsired to cease being a member of tf» OOUrt. f ; ,: : ..-;;-' u-.^l,!*:^';/" :fl:^-:- --■ Cross-examined: Was aware Brown had paid money to Mr. Bray^^ ;i ; [:} Mr Sandilands addressed, the; Courti Mr Staite said- -he would call no evidence, but .would plead certain lejjal objections in defence. , „ 1 Mr^^fo^ii&* defence; saio^ th» adoptlßii u of 'iM iot j l>eett gazetted. He di<t"not think ; the uppoin^mentiof the trustees iea» in order. Init doiwoiUd)base Jus defends ionvtik* interpretation- of CbneralLaw 151. {- ft ThfeCßwM^ said it seemed. he wa» called on to decide on section 151 and 152 of the- rules. Ha had carefully, read Jthem. r , Her considered the defendant liable for the> amount. Verdict for plaintiff with COStt»j(9S; I ij'f ''-" : :v ~ : ' '■'^•{'■■^■'■<^»- - ' J^e' y,;F^XCßroihi;;w>d J.^. Brown.-— Claim^ l ;'-I7a= ' 2cl 'from eicS. Same verdicis with costsin each case. P. Trebes t. .S*^J* Jensen.— Claim £4 l'Os. HSx Rnci^ : for plaintiff: THi* was a claim for wages. ' L defendant 1 at. Halcbm be y sta^w wort on June 20tn, and left after working six for the , fifat, four weeks 20s ; a-we*»k and tucker, and after that 255 ; when l^Ttt^E defendant puUed o* his coat and said he would^vo him' a hammed ing; he^efendant) wanted a weik'k notice; he gave him £2 and told him to dear out ; he showed a lot of money, and said, he (plaintiff ) 'tS wait a long umaLlfor the balance ; ku»oked;off work because the tucker was^not good ; could not worlc 'ofi^ aniJie,j&ouid not get his money ta ; J. Behye.ndt deposed * He kMr Jensen,. who had told him he,pai£ 20. a^week at first, and if the man ifie had to' giti 2os4irid^aore if he was worth it ; dTd not tell him he |#as w«fffi^iores .fault there 1 wats ho meat as he could I d/j much work v -. . ' tt ■- • ] Judgment f«rj|aaintiflfd|J&4 Is ftil