Duty on Butter in N.S.W.

Feilding Star, Volume VIII, Issue 23, 5 August 1886, Page 4

Duty on Butter in N.S.W .

In thrdiibUsyiom'in the New South Wales BiH^ameht on 'the Tarifl pro-' posals oPthe^Goveftimißni, re-imposing a dntyfc&il&pW lb on butter. Mr O'Sullivan said they had to oohsiiier the far i 3ingr (i fem I su£it^ it w&g time these men were protected against' the cheCpooiciptttaiionJß ritom 'cN«w Zealand and elsewhere. — Mr J.f H. Young moved the omission of i thei words " and lanl^andl stated. that he should alaolfep'pose the duty of Id per lb on the du^'W-biltter^'ott 'the 1 pWrnd' that it was one of the~aeeessarieß of Ufe.— SapSpatrM J^nhmga' did ; not' see wb^'-ttiero-ah^ul'd be a 1 duty oil baoon atid ( l(Jh<»ese and 'not " on u bUtter and lard, as that-W^uld ibe^a perfectly . consistent 6ou«ei' The duty on bacori' was 2d»f*2tihfM b»tito®jfiUtuti!%&) rr lb on lard was a fair value. — Mi" H. YoungKgaitf f thai if everything was t ' >^^TO^fc eva3F yiPF^ a^ way. Th9a^Ml i^x^vi^ii, i^ one, but he wouOT^opp' befr tn£' imposition of this new duty.-TfMr Purves said that if th&Fremier^wi«lMfeM j consistent, he shouldotaxmiaiie, because if farm products- were to be taxed, th^y-aHoUld tAx what producedthose pyodWW/sndiattke^Fhen cheap/ was laVgelyuiused ofbr feeding pigsi—^ After dSsonssidno tbe aniendmeht was carried-Qn'a!.diJvisfion.by 33 to 20 ; ;and the iteni«oß.-pajßs^d by 33;t0 l!k:u\ 0