Crawford v. Duke.
:/ ArcEiAupJJulj 28L- :.;;.. The tiondoa correspondents of th» j' Australian papers send fuUer details ,' of the Crawford-Dilko case than we '"* have already received. A despatch.: of the 20th to the MelbcHTue Agtf sajs:— "Eridenc© is still being taken "; in the divorce suit Crawford y. Crair- ; ( :. ford and Diike Yesterday the re^ v •pondent, Mrs Crawford, was in thef j witness box, and swore that the ad^ '.^ missions she had made to her .husband, the petitioner, as to her hiring visite4:v^ Sir Charles Mike at his- hoaa».lot^. * improper purposes were quite true, :•■,. aind in support of her statement she ■ gare a minute desenptien of Sir- ; Gharles ihlke's hedrdbm. : The respondent admitted that, she was aware : Sir Charles had previously been im- ' properly intimate with her mether.'* : Another despatch t» the Sydney Daily Telegraph says :— " The respondent, > . •: Mrs Crawford, swore that Sir Charles* : Dilke admitted t>> her that^ Eanny, ■ 1&VB Bogerson, and Mrs Smith' were* ' all his former, mistresses. Mrs Aston - v Dilke, sister t» Mrs Crawford, also Save evidence. She deposed thai -Sir . harles Dilke offered the respondent ' an annuity: provided she retracted the> . charges she had brought against him, . Among other witnesses examined were • some ' of the lodgers in the house ' ' where Mrs Crawford stated she com- " •; mitted adultery with Sir Charles. ■.': They all confirmed her statement^: ■ which were likewise corroborated byal;'' former servant of Sir Charles.*' ; tfcablsgmm of the 21st to the Sydney Morning Herald says :-it" The eyi- .. of Mrs Aston Dilke is the divorce case Crawford v. Crawford and .Dilke) confirms that given by/ 1 her sister. The case is developing stroagly against Sir Charles Dilke, who is accused' of immoral relations .with several of his servants, and maintaining a house <>f :. assignation. The Judge is. trying to .' prevent publicity of the disgustdn^ v details." . v '..d ..''l'k , ;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18860731.2.19
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume VIII, Issue 21, 31 July 1886, Page 2
Word Count
303Crawford v. Duke. Feilding Star, Volume VIII, Issue 21, 31 July 1886, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.