Feilding R.H Court
.': Wedne&a^, 28tlrJtr£Y, 1886. v : (Befpre Bv ferdV Esq., E.M.) Poli^T. ilfajMpnaoapt was charge^rithisteattpk^l? on July 24. ; v All witnesses in^thia case were or- ' dered.Vj.ut of- -«^_^'."' ;> --&z±. R. Neil, itablekeeper, aijHa«tie'o hotel, deposed : Me had- 4>&eii three , years employed by Mr Hastie; leftqst ..' 4 the- 28th of Jtroe; came ifciar^wtHftr? Jon the following Tuesday ; have known the prisoner -for ■ aimoathiorV& ! weeks ; he took witness's place diirinn: his^^eT^pri^K^^o^^ . stairs iii Hastie|s' 'hotel ilr Etasftfet.. ■= jpaid witness £16 by cheque tja th&/ pauk of Australasiji r oa^^wne 29'.; ; could not say whether .he^as'hed ikok '" j that day ; received, tw^p M *'■ pf A^stiutoi^.ttotes,^^^, ffiem ih;iu» # " pf#ks ibo<nk fhich was tKen placedin ' the outside pocket i o^ ( Mb coajt, 'wluclt ' WAshiinif ;on a' 7 peg;a|t^jtapof^»^ bed ; ;i^te r ,^ak^onji^pi^qL inore^n 1 * the packet book^Jhani ,th.b :£lfe Me ''&?€ l from Mr Hantiej saw tbTe ' ihppey -fS^ week, before he lost it"; felt the pocket book la«,t Friday ;'. put a jiarcSi^jof matches on the top of it; on SattfrdUy^ . iiijght A£r3 ; Haßtie niade-a oommurii<:a tion tqi Wiins^'^kd'^e^BUlt^was-^He^.' ireiit to his pocket -book'; 1 found the pocket was then pa top of the pftvcei 6fmatehes;wben"be looked in the pocket J>opk tKe mdney- wai -gbn'e ; . gare^ ab on<B i *utiority;iio -tftlce' the r .^" money ; a man named Frank T sl(?ptiD;;- ' the room • with him ; if lie had^ndt : been persuaded he would- not hare' prosecuted. •'• Gross -examined ■by r Mr ; Staite':: Have been on friendly terms with the; accused ; do not know whether hs had j money of his own f~he nerer told witness he had ntoney saved) to gbcawa\-; may have had two or three drinks - with prisoner; was positive £16 o»f.\ ibe notes w;ereßank ( of Australasia-; for one wedk the notes werelyihg in his pocket box>k unprotected ; the ] Servants look' aftirrihe 1 bedroom, and other peisohs have access Jo th^roofu; Frank has been working with; Talmer, ; the wood carter, amd sleeps in the ' hotel ; Mrgjfastie, tol^ .witness that the prisoner had changed a Vote; hada/few^.wiords iFith : : Mn.Qsof.fui(lr was discharged, but was now s>ack: in ' the same, employ.; objected to employ the i ©lice, because he did not want to bring^^fnybodj, vii»to. jtrouibje : bejqnd what Mra Hastie told witness he had no reasontpbeUeye prisoner stela the money; had no rta^n 'to believe ho was ajthief.. . .;. j.,.;";.".^. ., , - ; ■ ■ f -, ■ •! Kobert^gjan'^p^s^'r^He'"^^-'^ *' accountant boir^ing 'at Htistie's hotel; Remembered Saturday, the 24th inst. ; saw prisoner on that date- ihwitnels's bedroom No.. 12 he came to ask for a pair of legging* "witness had promised to lend him; about a minute before that heard some footsteps, ou.tr _ sjide in thia;.p^B^ft^^toiew;;the^Toom Neil slept in, which i» nearly ppposito., kn,ew prisoner had l«f t &f 8 "f tie's employ before tne 24m;" Ke. .told^ Witness ; acous^d pnttsed thf bedrc>oni : ! to collect the bootsV.tp .clean , them; iemembered Sunday, , the 25jh ; was with the Constable-when prisoner was arrested; prisoner said— " he did not know '^Kere No. ri was,?', nar^didjie know where Neil slept ; did n6t;hear the Constable — who "was iii' plain elotb,«^^-cautiqn : accused ; .when.,h» 4 was being, searched at! ilie peii<se caf^^: denied having 1 any more moihejr-; -B© J jsaid Mrs Hastie ha!d 5s or 6s his ; did not hear him' say he had given her a pound; saw accused at' Awahuri on Tuesday, the ' 20th • inst ;» he .paiifor some drinks- ait jthe hotel taer* ;< ihe said he had only : ls, and as ne was ihelpin^iritneTswifh som"eT(j^& c give him 2s ; accuwd hail, ju^Jief ore said he [had left Mr Hastie!? |»njpl|>yment. - ' . f Oi^<exainined :^ Haye i tsoen-pris^ oner about towii the Inst2 inonthp; haVe heard h© played with the Charjiiig ■' Groi» n 'lWuper knew nothingiagainst his character. >-. Mrs Martha Haatie, the Wife of Mr James Hastie, landlord ef ihe FpiWing hotel, deposed : Knew the prisoner I who Jbad been employed at the hotel for 3 weeks as groom and boots «;t 20sv per week; did not know exactly the date He commenced, to work; fbjotight it would be the 26th of Tune; betook Neil's place; gave him his cheque and paid him off last Monday week ; £2 13s 6d was the amount ; he had received 5s cash and owed Is 6d^ which made the total ; he had stayed at the htotel since; he^has paid for everything he has had ; he k|ii4 shouted more lately than he did before ; Neil slept in No. 2 room ; prisoner passed that room every morning; he slept in a bedroom in tho Hfxt section to th© kotel; after he left their employ he had no business . upstairs; saw accused in the aftenioea last Saturday :v^e came into the bar and chantred a £1 note in payment ol 3 drink*; gave him 1 8/6 back ; saw him .-. afterwards ;' He shouted sixdrinks and = •>' K»to another note screwed up ; ho asked witness to keep, the chan^for Wm; was busy andlkept the note in ■^e,r hand;; when witness ; ,iwent; **> P^t it away in the cash i box discovereo^^t . . was a£6 note; ■. tied it in a -knpi aiid . put it with the other note | (m>W pn^ duced and identified) ; marked )fitj» initials M.M. ; No> 6141 "l&tiJiutitAustralasia; the accused knew th» money had been paid to Neil. '*'"*■' l'* Cress-examined t ifaV on 'Sfrtuis day night witness g^t th* £5 aoto from accused ;, there were a number of people in the bouse ; prisoner «|uiarreled with a man called Tommy, who» witness hoard eay he bad loot a silk .pocket. , handjkerchief ; .hail? 5k .. 6d .. 0f prisoner's when, he was arrested, ; ho boarded in the house* after h» was•dlSOhafged;,,-;-;;-'-•-:'■," ;;; ; i' ■.-;: ■ J-:,'?^ " Frank Whitton deposed* Be was a draper in Feildingv f or ' C SmStb., Vof "Wellingtou; knew prisoner asiaj>eus;toinier; on . Saturday night of . Jjiiy ; 24th'^ he was 'at yntii ai*s afcop' ind ! purchased goods to' the extent dH£& isls-on^W^^^'WHau'gfe; \>y iiimself, and theii he canie* in iwith • • • :a : j a v .■■■■■ o ... :• •*# ■
two women for whoin he bought j gloves and a feather; he paid for, then* : in ' the first instance by a £5 note Bank of Aus'sralasia'J (note produced) No. 3975'; on" the 17th inst. he bought a ttd^rsaiidVest tor 12s. ©roBS-exanime'd :' TlaVe known prisoner about two months' -fare had been a fair, custom^.; .had ,heard W f >rmedW!Bidls' as^k -Charing MinstreU d"i^ ni»t,. J k»6-vf the names of tp'lfc K wVladie,s yhq came with hiin ; one;'^asNßlde)eljr : aud the~ othej?*her ; • daughter..' -■>. 3 h'-'-hy^'^i Mrs^Enimao Bellve deposed:: bJie , was the wifefof iE^eves M'BeHve^of . the >Empire, Hotel; remembered' 'Sa^ < urdkV-July 24 : : changed ■:%$&?$& ' for Ui&M^^rh^M^^e , and'ttfn; itfthS ■iattVtfi'ngV '•%**+ JoM 'iTao^aiPomf 3 4eppM: , W was^-ialsSrer^Maidinflr, In! Feilding ; knew prißOii4^;' , : was, „ witk^hW; ; 0E Sunday, fee t^jSjjr,,.** Aiwabfcn, prisoner paid ( for two^or three' drinks. 1 in silver; thought W gave a ; but was not su»ph«^re*%iita«M no Nichqlali Mowis ;d?po«M: He , was^ , a obiik at s Hastifa'« hotel 1 ; winemberfd Thursday, last^. the ,22n4 in^t.;; Bair i; prisoner ;. he ca,me ( into. tk« jkitchen ;at :2.3d;- he fßai^ < h« ? Uai;.n,otjnpii dinner.;; a man who is short of money. dods>riot ' care for dmner ; he pulled out [ four pence in copper* v ftiid *aidv tiKat was ( all the nioney he had, .* '.''-:'"..'): dross^eximined : ' Do net tell .eyeryl»ody how mubh money he has nothing against •prisoner's charapter ■;, : tnew nothing about him earning ; money as a minstrel. •!:•.< ConstableMeehau deposed : ffe was , : stationed atjEeilding; from informa^ : \ tion received' he arrested prisoner ■; the 25th in Kj^gstreet, on suspicion of . ;. «teaHng£|7 j^^H^edthe notestbpiis-; '. oner ; %h%n : gijitijg'toi^(the* police «|^wn'/ '-. pris^ner'said he did not" know where! \ Neil slept; usen searching prispner; r asked hjm.to^putput allthe^p^y he. \ had on the table ; these was 8s ; asked him if he iadf.^ny more^ tttoney bef djre ' he sealed .;liim ;■ pruener «aid he ' had not but Mrs Haatie owed him 5s '
or 6s; f puad ttQ inane taon«y on. him ; Hoberfe Logan: was witness to the constable searching- prisoner; a month previous had ejected, prisoned from the Denbigh Hotel; he said he had jfcfcttr no money- - " ' Cross-examined: -have known the prisoner about' nine months; have never ssea- jihjia - t working ; /-. b.e< ;was ; working about an hotel as a kitchen man; knew he had: performed with a company one night in Feilding and on^. night in .Bulls.; ( j:; .; = :•} ■:---l--\ Thai wo* the vase tor the proaecution--' ■•••■■ •••■• .. -■.. ■-;.-;.■■•;.. ", •., M^Cai^ s^oke for the f^efenfee ' ' \ The Bench said there was a prima ///rirtvcase V; agaiiist the ['■ prisuucnF said he was not •jruil|y- I ''and i was coaimitted forvtrial^^ejne^t sittings of Sujireuie CiViirt,' Wangauuil 4 The soUcitor.for prj^pner appKed-fOr. hiin'to be admiti^.ji» •,)>aii. Ou, the application of MrC. Henry aj-eheaTJJi^ ,w^a grauted in the case; Henry v Kooroilteaao. ; iGlaim £5 Is. The application was heard before Messrs) htiiky^vid .''Thojiipsoii. J\B.'», who had^eard thecaae befnre' t tl. He%v ffugnes?- Claim £4 28J Judgmeufc.^)r {( j)laiu^ff. w|sh.,.<;o#»* To be paidiii one uiouth. j Hilconf.lie and fiherwill v AFoko
MopUq^ii,;yiJ37: $1^ ■ Il \jQf/ i this aiuouirt cretlit wkß^^gf**>n to -defendant of 4efe^dii«t.^'tiyp'iuu ; u».hs: ; - Neil; £)uiffy v T. JC E. T-ylbr.— CMni JB2d ! i96? : mi6t*ms feu/ijtilkiidg'^i' plaintiff . : A ; ie^pff j «5f • 33s' 'had been fiieaT :f! j^fe"u^lai^ ; 4SL^d!icted hlsVowii case. • ' .•. ■ . ■ ' ■ *Phi«i'tfse
between Octoh«if and June 9tU, 'IBB6i beihiib^aac* of ApcoUni? i'; Neil"ihiff^'4ep««atl: .^H<frMfirti a laborer, at pwik^tj, had gone; to; fQ v k , f oc d9/p«diint:oii Optoher 241^ 1685 s ;, arrangement 'j|aa inadfl on the:2S}ud| inj jl* ;Ts^|fr'a .^opi at ;T:UraH£%;»; 7A s per^day.:^^f j^ ( price 'agre^on.f'fcf; w«as j£o. So .aft .lands '•£ worlc.'jpjiftlie piacft l?ad tjeen injeering catti«, • mending 1 ' f enpeß> 'd&rying, &®. ;'Sai|ii(^Tajpin; r .a -aerrjan^of 4|Bfen4aht,'^nt plaintiff to Turakina to re£6rf ! Shat" * jffie : 'cifcaik*', wai .ahPi^ ' bf water ; received induction* to 'water th& bktlfe ; workedl9s' dayaf^iiiu&y the" aamtf af other day ; '$£# Taylor ; he woulct iib't wort for 5s 1 'a day.; Taylor told, him to go bna£73« <>oßs : (Biainined : ! Eaci wp&ea^fte £40 v a ; 'year' ind.fouria;.(a d**';^** l^ ■"rodwed, containing ;&n - <; ag:4ftine'nV to ' .li^r¥lojt'2Zß:a/^eek,, wa« put inrßJffc dttiicej? Kaye iiaid foremilk) butfter andi ; potatoes ; at faUfog: bush, wo^el ughl houre^a dayfo^ .^eelcis; on January 31st, at 1 Turakjjaa, told defendant he nad^i&lied buahfeUing^, nothing was saail."abdiit ; Agoing on' wages far jobbing' wojrk |f';di<i ; , not remember being told.jn<at to uia]je a tal^about 78 a day, *Ti^6n^M wa« not getting that ; had .a day.at Chelr j teaham Hotel ;' did noi go to work' nest day; as he y^MakS ppm jnmit: *wg logs when ] mustering- the e^ttle ; worked on Day— milkqa • cows^ and .mendecf/fences; rode for a bottle of .'. because thja^^adiea i^3- complained it' was a dry Chrreiwporked on New Year's .pay jwinembered June 9tti, wl en defendant wanted to haW^a- settlbtuent, and offered 7« * day tor the busnfellihg atid 30a> a week- for the Test of the time. ;'•" T;; X -■ ' '<•;.' ".'■■■ ■* '*:•••;) ■
FortHe^dtefenMnt, Samuel Graham, was ?«&s(£ ;^^j 4?PPtf?4 : Jfe was working f©r d!«rendant at Kiwitea ; remembered Duffy &w»ing id work in; October ; ■< witaess bad '. recommended Duffy to apply to Taylor for work i He went to.wprk at %u«hfalling . at 7V« day ; i o^2othi 1 -S7th' aaci 12M'NbVember .I)'jmy did. not work ; when witness w.e'nt'to fefciih'his mother-in-law. Dufljjk did not work ;: nor did he on Christnipt: JI>W or N«nw/ Year's . Day ; he finished' liushfalliug -a iortaight afteiv.Chvistopas; fytibßi ; days : > on whxcaV plaintiff d*£ not isrork Vwe .mentioned.) ; witn^ffi was paid SOs * we«k, and a share
in the butter made as payment for overtime ; had . made , £2Q worth of butter in eighteea months. ; Donald McKonzie, 'a farmer, , at ., Kiwitea, deposed i Wet and" 4ry w ( ages : ran from 15s to 25s a weeK*'aiid r found and 6s a day and" find themselves; Duffy is a good man, H w6r'iti 6s 1 a. day f 30s a week, wet and dry, is good wages these ; tim^ ; ■' i .-"^ :! ' 1 ' : ' i ' v ' '"" : '''"''l
| ; Defendant he had 'engaged, the plaintiff in October, -at ?1 7s^a day; ! for .4)ushfallin^''Bihb i uri a day; he had finished the wofk by the 1 7th January ; told him to go.o v n at jobbing, work ; !D'uffy went -to* -'Marion, where witness ,saw him drunk ;• "no w.ork r was don^e-afc' •Kiiwpa ■" that' week :by Dufjy ; tbld; him iaftei^waSdb ! he iwbuld- onljr ir grve ? ft^m 30s a week, - ..^-yi^^nUV v j%^sf-©xamjned ; : •.-^ftffji^WW (i an(i, Sandilauds' had , written .'to twitue^he ■ had ilauked > plaintiff • to^i to work ; understood he was not going,- Wt found lie had gone to work ; : 'did not otter Duffy £I^% ie^tle;the caiie r inefjiV more than £5. Judgment for plaintiff f»r £10 and IStevens and &ortQh y S. 7 Rowle^^-. Claim J£l6^l3s lOd, fox oommjiseion and advertising 'for putting ; iip(land for sale, and goods purchaejeji . in the store. .... ;'.';.•; '". , ':'/- iU -'!' ■ '.:-.. - x -- •. j Mr Fraiiklin, clerk t* Stevens and Gorton, proved jthe^claiin; • 5 •' ! Mr W. S. Staiie deposed :!' < .'advised Rowley;to settle hi« furniture and! effects on his wife; had told the latter, she should become : responsible .for the. payment of ? .Stevens',and,,Gbr.tdn's account ; she had done so ; therefore he submitted plaintiffs i tthould be nonsuited.
•; ! Judgment for plaintiffs with costs i2os and counsel's' fee 21 «(. : ; Haleombe & Sberwill v H. Hughes. -—Claim £5. if f SandUands f or plainr tiffs. was a claim fpr ca^h lent.; A cheque was forwarded to Hughes at ;^anganuirler but the^letter eonit^tining the. , cheque was ,f tolen, by a man named Killeen. . "
, i H. L. depowdt'iOnFriday,,---2lßt May, Hughes applied for £5; agreed to advance it on a certaia nVare ; the mare was sent to his paddock, arid so he sent the money.' <T ' ; Cross-examined: Posted the cheque at 4 p.m. ; had received a telegram saying, the cheque had not arrived; still hold, theihorse as; security. ;„ : A. Thomson, Clerk to the E.M. Court, produced the papers in the, inatter, of Hughes, v Eileen, charged and7 convicted ;'Vpf , . having :. stoien a, cheque £5, the property of H. Hughes. . "For the defence, j , .-;,,,;>■ ... ; ,;;V , ' Hughes deposed : He ,^ad" borrowed on a mare from plaintiff s ; j instructe^Sherwiil to forward, the money by wire.. i. .■ i " 5 ! Cross-examined : Expected a post office order on Saturday. i Judgment for plaintiffs with costs. ■; This 'was 'all the business. 1 '
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18860729.2.15
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume VIII, Issue 20, 29 July 1886, Page 2
Word Count
2,281Feilding R.H Court Feilding Star, Volume VIII, Issue 20, 29 July 1886, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.