Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

BATTLE-AXE AGAIN TO THE FRAY.

to tub editor or thi #»ldin« stab. Sib, — Tour correspondent M Pro Bono Publico," replying to my former letter, evidently "flurries his milk* in a mostalarming fashion. It is not^iy intention to draw comparisons between the relative merits of what your ; coni-espon-dent is pleased to imagine my "favorite tipple," and the gaseous compounds lie ' appears to patronise, and to whid^,b c ">« himself evidently bears some affinity, but to treat with the more important question of public works. I am well aWaro that certain of the Councillors originally contemplated the filling in of thelpmhoL ton road drain, and if "Pro Bono Publico " will again refer to the published. schedule of works, he will observe that 50 chains of road construction are -provided for in Kimbolton road, which I presume is intended to mean the filling in of the said drain and additional nietaL ling. Your correspondent objects to the construction of Warwick street ifrein Kimbolton road to Fergusson street, -f^d to Fergusson street from Warwick street, to Manchester street. And why? Is it because he opines that it would be (if constructed) a veritable " road to "ran," leading as it does, direct from the iniro of the saleyards to Roe's Hotel, and for this reason to remain "for over and a day" in its prestine beauty. If so .his. opinions are extremely cramped, narrowminded and selfish. I assert that the formation of these streets is not only -justifiable from a property-owner's point df view, but absolutely necessary as a public ,. convenience — a work to, which (with a veiy small outlay) will remove one of tiie. most objectionable eyesores in the centre ■-; of the town. As regards the question of sewerage I can only reiterate my previous assertion that such a scheme is nnneces-r sary in a small town like this, and would moreover be too expensive for us toeerry^ out. Let "Pro Bono Publico" edopt proper means for the pi-eaervatJdt. •or health in the way of cieanlinwi '*^m£[ ercise, and he will find himself none the . worse for want of sewerage works, lot; much better as far as pocket is eoneeraed. ' — lam, &c. f Battu*Axb.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18830315.2.15

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume III, Issue 79, 15 March 1883, Page 2

Word Count
360

CORRESPONDENCE. Feilding Star, Volume III, Issue 79, 15 March 1883, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE. Feilding Star, Volume III, Issue 79, 15 March 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert