THIS DAY.
f Bef or k til W_H»i Esq,' -I.M-. and F Lethbeidge, Esq., J.P.) The depositions'taken last Saturday, in the, .case, B#ti ft Walter sj - for , laTpejry of a wat-el-. were read over. The Magi£tratfraddrfesfl#Mhe prisoner, and asked her if she wished|to make any .-statement — duly cautie»ing her. The prisoner; wstyoned her jstatementf untrl'Mr Pririr^Bad _,ddr'essed the" Court on "the evidence fflfJthe : prosecution. Mary Ana Walter? .deposed : Mrs Belfit lent her watck; witness said she did not w^h'her^husbSgd to know she had lent it r^e~(th'e prisoner) i.lent^ the. witness twb hooks ;'. *ri_aess ' -aid her' husband was fond of-reading ; before she . '(the prisoner-) left? f he ibqoksj 6he : #iidshe •was going to take tnemjo her mother; Mrs Bel fit said r that, if she did no,* leave; the book's -he wo_u\d 'not lend the watch ; "-did'-tot 'see '^fe-fif! ; the}i ' left f Cr Wellhigtpn'', ssm'e'ri ir.ested, a*ked Campbell what iit was for ; ihe toldvher; khe said: .thtiti could ■hot^be; as. thei watch was lent ; made. , same statement. at, the Wellington police station j was advised to make 'no 'eh. fence 'hr the" Court 'at Wellington, and did not do ; so ; whien painpbefiiswonetshb tOoM tlie watoh,' did- not •contradict Jaim, "a_ she .was advised not to <lo so. /.;• -iii- .» _>.!■• I' ■ .Tames Hugh deposed? Sold the watch to Mrs Belfit a^ct identified it ; the present value of flic watch is not more than £4 lO^as' it 1 i's 5 ih hadordert and would <^^s-t'6irafitm i Tfcpa ; ir. 7 '' ' Cross-eiatoined-i Would -sill' it for £4 10s. ---.i:.':- ''I- '■''"' ' M>.-I?riqr asked the: Court, to deal sumn^rrily . , wiJth / thp , case„ , by amending the luforra^Uoa'ajad. ja^akipg: the value of the article' s'tbip_u'l<?ss tlian 4?5. The amended information was read to accused, and she -.gain pleaded hot guilty to tW. charged oil: -_•:'■- :i n> • •■'■ '• Mr frior ,»iddiieps«4 fche Bench for the defence^ . j „;.,,„, c ,.,._ , The Trench found her guilty, and seatenped her, to one month's imprisonment in Wrin^-hm gabi Hkrd labor. MarriW«rj_e*'v H.'Hbrtte. (Under the [ Destitute Persons ActJ) ! '- ">" •- > Defendai»-'i)le_.d_a' not .guilty, to a Charge, eij failing to. support his wife and 4* children. , . ■_ i ' . Mary Horfte deposed : Had 4 children; her TTus^i_^lcfr"Eer"Telri weeks" ' ago, without mpney or provisions ; got some money itKls mominfe-^£2 -the first she had -received for 11 ;weeksj the' Benevolent Society and the- neighbors had been
! supplying her with food ; her husbant j,iomi- I her £'i per month, but he hae not fulfilled that promise E.l! Wgh*. ifon. Sec. of the Be ' nevoid i: iS eiety, ti. -posed : Iv Augus' last wr- s nt for to see the Clerk to th< Bench -I'lbii! Hn: ne's children, who won ' -r.irrin^; i <• gav<- relief amounting to 12i tid ; on another occasion, 15s ; Home ii one of the best laborers in Feilding, and can earn 8§ per day ; Home stated ht had not received any money until yestera dayHome was ordered to pay 20s week'intojthe Court, and find security to amount of £20 to secure the payment. Failing to find this security, he was to be imprisoned for three mouths. A number of unimportant debt cases were heard, and the Court then adjourned. "
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18820913.2.23
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume III, Issue 26, 13 September 1882, Page 3
Word Count
515THIS DAY. Feilding Star, Volume III, Issue 26, 13 September 1882, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.