Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WASTE IN FARMING.

HENRY FORD’S VIEWS, “The farmer makes too comp,ex an affair out of his daily work". I believe that, the average farmer puts to a really useful purpose only about 5 per cent, of the energy chut he spends. If anyone ever equipped a factory in the style, say, the average farm is fitted out, the place would be cluttered with; men,” writes Mr Ford in the first of a special series of arTeles in November '•‘Life..,” “The worst factory in Europe is hardlv as bad as .the average i‘a.rmbarn/’ says Mr Ford., ‘ Power is utilised to the least possible degree. Not only is everything done by hand, but seldom is a thought given to logical arrangements. A farmer doing his chores will wa(k up and down a rickety ladder for years instead of putting in a few lengths of pipe. Tlis whole idea when there is extra vvor]< to do, is to hr.'e extra men. He thinks of putting money into improvements as an expense. Farm products at their lowest prices age dearer than they ougn. to be. It is waste motion—waste effort--that makes farm prices high and profits low. "On my own farm at Dearborn we do evdrything by machinery. We have eliminated a great number of wastes, but we have not as yet touched on real economy, We have not yet been able to put in five or ten years qf intense night-and-day study to discover what really ought to be done- We have ieft more undone than we lyive done. Yet at no time—no mattejr what the value of crops—have we fat led to turn a firstclass profit. We are not farmers —we are industrialists on the farm. The moment the farmer considers himself as an industrialist,, with a horroij of waste, either in material or in men, then we are going to have farm products so low-priced that all will be considered as among the least hazardous and most profitable of occupations. “Lack of knowledge of what if. going on, andl lack o>f knowledge of what the job rqaily is, and ithe best way of doing it, arc the reasons why farming is thought not to pay, Nothing- could pay '.he way farming is conducted. The farmer follbws luck and his (forefather. He does not know how economically to produce, and he does not know how to market. A manufacturer who knew how neither to produce nor to rnaite would not long stay in business. That the farmer can stay on shows how wonderfully profitable farming tyut be.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FRTIM19221124.2.35

Bibliographic details

Franklin Times, Volume 9, Issue 787, 24 November 1922, Page 9

Word Count
425

WASTE IN FARMING. Franklin Times, Volume 9, Issue 787, 24 November 1922, Page 9

WASTE IN FARMING. Franklin Times, Volume 9, Issue 787, 24 November 1922, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert