Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TOO MUCH DETAIL

ARBITRATION JUDGE’S COMPLAINT MORE HELP FROM CONCILIATION COUNCILS EXPECTED [Ter United Press Association.! AUCKLAND, September 16. Submission to the Arbitration Court of technical questions in award proceedings which could have been more properly decided in the Conciliation Council was commented upon by the president of the court, Mr Justice Page, when the hearing of an application for a new award by the Auckland Electrical Workers’ Union was continued. Mr W. E. Anderson appeared for the employers and Mr K. B. Simpson for the union. “ We thought it right that the court •should make some reference to the form in which the recommendations of the Conciliation Council reached it,” stated the president, when announcing that

the court’s‘decision would be reserved. The court expected that matters such as wages, hours of work, overtime payments, and holidays were matters which they would be normally called upon to decide, but where there were intricate technical questions involved they wore primarily matters for the Conciliation Council. “ For instance, the court spent the best part of the day on the interpretation of a clause trying to find out what branches of industry were meant to be covered by the award,” continued the president. “ Similarly in regard to the manufacture of electrical equipment the court has been mked to build up a set of special conditions, none of which had been even discussed in the council. These technical questions are obviously matters which should bo dealt with in the council, where the members are all experts and infinitely better equipped to decide the question, or at any rate to state in clear language the issue on which they are unable to agree. There seenis to have been no real attempt made in the Conciliation Council to reach common ground on these technical questions. The court is entitled to more help on such technical matters and cannot function unless it receives such help. Wo find it extremely difficult to make an adequate and completely satisfactory award unless we receive that assistance.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19360917.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 22446, 17 September 1936, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
336

TOO MUCH DETAIL Evening Star, Issue 22446, 17 September 1936, Page 2

TOO MUCH DETAIL Evening Star, Issue 22446, 17 September 1936, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert