Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VETO ON SUBMARINES

THE AMERICAN PROPOSAL ITS IMPORTANCE DOUBTFUL. Press Association —By Telegraph Copyright. PARIS, February 5. The Press describes Mr F, B. KclJo (r(r ’s suggested abolition of submarines as°livpocntical and egotistical. It is pointed out that the United States joined Franco and Italy in opposing the British suggestion at the Washington Conference, and tho newspapers consider that the change in the American view is only intended to make their own public believe that America would have disarmed long ago if Europe had been willing. Apparently it has been forgotten that neither the United States nor Britain would allow anyone to touch its battleships, cruisers, and destroyers.—A. and N.Z. Cable. A BRITISH COMMENT. LONDON, February 6. The naval correspondent of the ‘ Daily Telegraph ’ says it is not wise to attach much importance to Mr F. B Kellogg’s submarine declaration. In the last six years Japan has laid down, or authorised, fifty submarines, while the United States built only six; consequently the inhabitants of the Pacific Slope have come to the conclusion that the submarine is the only fighting ship able to carry war to the American coast. The diplomatic correspondent of the ‘ Daily Telegraph,’ however, is of the opinion that Mr Kellogg has satisfied himseli that Japan is prepared to abandon the submarine if the other Powers are willing to do likewise.—A. and N.Z Cable.

[Mr Kellogg on Saturday advised the Foreign Relations Committee of the House of Representatives that _ the United States Government was willing to sign a treaty with all the Powers prohibiting the use of submarines entirely.]

FRENCH PRESS CRITICAL

Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright.

PARIS, February U.

(Received February 7, at 1) a.in.)

“ Mr Kellogg is wasting bis time," says ‘ Quotidien,’ in pointing out that the submarine is the only weapon with which small countries with small navies can defend themselves against dreadnoughts and cruisers. If Mr Kellogg’s proposal were accepted he would gain a signal triumph in clearing away the last obstacle to the tyranny of the seas dreamed of by American imperialists.—Sydney ‘ Sun ’ Cable.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19280207.2.41

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 19784, 7 February 1928, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

VETO ON SUBMARINES Evening Star, Issue 19784, 7 February 1928, Page 5

VETO ON SUBMARINES Evening Star, Issue 19784, 7 February 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert