THE ANGLICAN SYNOD.

Evening Star, Issue 4274, 7 November 1876, Page 4

THE ANGLICAN SYNOD.

Thefollosßßg was the principal business fcj|Hlfla*e(Jt«fc yesterday i» sitting:— Ilji wasi resolved, ' atisfac->-A 1 ta^^rq^^fcH^lhe payr a curate, it is dei6'mquju^ n yjc».jM2n?n^npfry*fcbsejianiadefi^#..ol| l * From a return presented to the Diocesan Ti.s—lufir itjafrpearfetf thai the total ieceipts_ for the year-ending June 30, 1875/-w*P' an'a'the expenditure for the Mine period; L 90- 9s Qd, .■ leayipg i cash y Vfianee "of L2od The lialMie} up to November Ist wereX3s9 J,6a IOOf-shx wing a deficit o|,-LfiO 14s/WJ(tr >ers of. ! the Diooe^sg^Baaid:-Clerical: Ven. iErcTfc 1, deacon EdwasOs, the Rev. Mr Stanford, ?A «HkJJ&> Bfiv; TMK3GfSmserv Olfa rmen : Messrs GWOook, IMaitland, and Y\ ayne ; and as theHStanding Committfi£=C lergy : S. TlLrcfcdlaccfl, Edwards,.. l M&sr J-ats nf ord, »H hrißefumeifeWd Br&ffiw. J : tfessrs ** a otfWm^M^Jno%^G i hTt"r committee, consider wpether affected by the-present regulations in egard to mamagfef etatrairid licenses,"- the Rzv. R. r—Lr-SrA-raoftD-said-that iargeTiTraibers were reason marriage fees levied upon President said tiiat as the qulfitfen^was'one which concern :d the £pJeopßatian<; officer generally, he thought thaVit should he discussed by the General [ • Synod, if here thgether Bishopsjpgiould be : .' : (VprejenW-hThe metitoi'was then canted, and coniniittee. appdinted?■:—The Bishop, the Ven/ Arohdeaconj ,s fike' Jlevs. j,,,., MessH^ ( Giff9rdj Tanner} a&d(Beaumont, and j 0 IJ} s&es#B3 Brent, and Hough- ,... -o ljb?fcF lytini-.u- 'y ! hi: ' --.;'• -■: >£to The following was carried ne«i. eon. :— i j ■:!::iMl , SMali^hiß c Sy.nc^, p havjrig\ i h'eafd'jof the coni sol i|«fflsißted e aepa^^ to the neighboring diocese of Ghmtchfurch, " desires to iHace upon recofcCits.sense of his efforts, wflaeT'fesident in Otago." Abid it -■■ hei fowarded to Mi- Penny, with the :r pishes ( of the-jSyiggd. for she -gueceiss of,rbioi7AP^eJfea' ifca ~r; - Jti. j : a, /ssdlflo , Thafosince..alleburtunited ecclesiastical, action has been ; iiak©a>on the oiijiO«idferstM[s»i*ig'thatwe f arb«intfegral part of jIo is found 1 that _ a wWafe unacquainted ~ _^SS^iJ?B?rtTd ie P-^9^i^ s '- PS33 desirous of * name of the Church of England on the stsength of these points on Which ■:!:WWatefcuttflar, ti£ she; oJiginalhtiidy, add are opposed to the-assumption of a Provincial ii er Colonial tiame merely oiit aCfcoupit'bf: local i«I «%f^engei*cf ; fuiance- this £! -- ; Sya6a r >; i.wtnild '■ "respectfully,liAufetj the :: u ©etieraV n Synod ; to^ I Wo'Mo!eir*|the. important matter." Mr Macbor¥''observed - : =ffia«9'lhW had heartf the ,p .Trwant,isto L-lixfe and die ia; me'mhfer oft the ,£ tlOiardpofiEhgland,'? jjid was inclined to ,■:; •-.. atgataient that by chahging the name •(. ;'*tf>fkti&ft'~fe the Church England. It :/- Chjarch, 10 .tlfigSfflp W|aiPgu'e > d , jbHghly improper E f Thi Ret Mr l 0 . t ;(^nHAM^iregajded v p.as^,sest^ -L : s<'{dfcb© namejof;the..Chwch of./ England, and vai^ieliebyitoowawaya;italisman which'they could little afford* to lost. They had instituted Qai£-ahsnrdHitter«aH«f-:hei thought tht ,' l\.T@®efal,;Syj»d. shonlji haye? 4 :«Sfipted; the .£>. i. -roSfifie Episcopalian, Anglican, or something .<yj descriptive'aad reasonable; '