RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 4210, 24 August 1876, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before J. Bath^fev?^^s.M,) Comrieand Howorth v. Alfred Grave.— Claim L 6 ISs 6d for groceries supplied. Defondant did not appear.—His Worship save judgment for L 5 8s 6d, deducting LI 10s Lil 10s for boots. Judgment for .plaintiff with costs. - u - WsUon. v. HbeneseE-Cor-jeyT-OaHTTnromrjdapiiiimmm , *?. r . coals supplied/.-Mr vEewis defended.— ■ Plaintiffs were* unable to offer any evidence iSSS *wKty top.^.a^a, ■ Oaledoniah Quartz Mining 'Ocmnjutf '^’ • Tiumthyi-tephenson.—Ulai'm T,]j? g debt foroallrf.' X)#■ ‘feridtottt etatedthatheh&d fiiedhis schedule W the I *• f ß.;Chapman appeared; riffs ; Mr A. : Bathgate fori , hLis Worship said thatunder the Aboli- ! tionof Imprisonment for Debt Actthepe^eere I only:; certain: oireumstanofes- whidrjmitmW tbe Court in man to prison*: ! sh» mprt ?impori»nf, was. where-there? is /frajwki and, second, means and thedebtor ,d»oefiW»t :pay. Where a Workingmanhas no nwmns ; P a 7 a debt incurred to his grocer. Butcher, or baker, but afterwards getsmft) ;good employment, itwasonly frur th&taome j °. hiß future earningsr should pay for his nrej "rip,us r cpuuts between ’merchants, or like . this he, (bis' Worship) would have hp i hesitation in saying that unless a clear*s*e : made .outitrwonid be a breach of -tho ifmSS'? a ;' mm ta - pli * n - 'V* I, »’dW^^ddicib-^