Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENT.

[Bx Teleqhaph.]

ABOUT THE LOBBIES. (From our Special Corr p *pon<.te t.) Wellington, July 24. Caucusing has been the order of the afternoon, the committee rooms being given up to them;

The' Argus,' in reporting the principal meeting thus, is mainly correct:—"The Otago members met to-day, and agreed to a final form of separation proposals, to be laid before the Canterbury members, which were afterwards submitted to Canterbury for consideration. Thirteen from that Province attended. With regard to the debt, it was proposed to apportion it between, the two Islands in the proportion of L 190,000 for the North Island to LGIO.OQO for the South. The Canterbury members objected to this division as being unfair to the South, and stated that they did not set their way to financial separation, though inclined to insular. On a vote nine voted against the Otago proposals, one for them, and three expressed no opinion. At the same time a feeling was expressed in far >r of throwing out the Ministry in the financial policy and plauing in office a Government which would be prepared during the recess to consider the possibility of insular separation. The facts are, there is a general division in the camp. Firstly, Mr Whitaker

finding it hopeless to carry his resolutions dm -publicly announced his intention of withdrawing them in favor of a separation resolution, to which he has given in his adhesion. When the details ef the Otago proposals were explained at the Canterbury meeting they found little favor, the mode of dealing with the land fund being stroagly objected, to. Mr Wason was the only Canterbury member who voted in favor of them. He expressly declared himself >'n falser of two Provincial Governments. Messrs Stevens, Fieher, and Brown were the nou-contents. Since the abandonment of Mr Whitaker's resolutions the Auckland members themselves are not the same happy band, many of their number, particularly those from the country, openly declaring against separation. The Opposition leaders admit that the prospect of carrying Separation resolutions is anything but hopeful now. On a careful study of the situation we give them 37 or 38 decided votes. Seventeen is all Otago will furnish to the Opposition, an d the delay may reduce that number by one or two." : The financial tables were circulated today, and the Government are now determined to force on the discussion on the policy. If the Opposition wish for delay till Friday the Government are prepared to consent to an adjournment till then, but with the plain understanding tlat the Counties Bill will be gone on with.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760725.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 4184, 25 July 1876, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
430

PARLIAMENT. Evening Star, Issue 4184, 25 July 1876, Page 3

PARLIAMENT. Evening Star, Issue 4184, 25 July 1876, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert