RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Wednesday, July 12. (Before T. A, Mansford, Esq., R.M.)
Judgment went for plaintiffs by default in tbe following cases, with costs T. C. Reid v. M'Kenzie, L2t on a dishonored bill; Christina Paterson v. Edward Towsey, of Lawrence, L3O for wages due. Hamilton v. Manning.—Claim LlO, for breach of agreement. Mr E. Cook for jilaiutiff; Mr Stewart for defendant.—Plaintiff stated that he was engaged by Messrs Sparrow and Co, who had a contract to erect a machinery at Arrowtowu. Defendant agreed to give him LlO to put the machinery in working order, and he accepted the offer.—Plaintiff was nonsuited.
Oliver and Ulph v. P. Grant.—Claim L6B 17s Bd, on a promissory note. Mr Brent appeared for plaimiff.J Mr Stewart, who defended, submitted that the Colonial Bank, t® whom the bill had been re-endorsed, were the parties who should sue.—His Worship held that the bill being originally ondorsed to plaintiffs entitled them to sue,—Judgmont was given for plaintiffs, with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760712.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4173, 12 July 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
162RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4173, 12 July 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in