THE LAND QUESTION.
%o..the Editor. " ?
Sir,—The following remark occurs invonr leader on the : Teceiit -action, of the Waste land Board in reference to the sale of the €6,000 ' ...si-vi < i YTe ®nt It-ftft iwiy sensible man whether, iLtUa ‘ land, .Were' of 1 tjw Darren quality 1 desoribedf, the 1 leafeOß, occupaftoiTofit for years, and must perforce bare ttnddfstoodita; capabilities, ■ would have been in such a burry tq buy it, that the ink was scarcely dry on’ tb^'*’Gazette ' before their: applications were lodged; still more, that they would have voluntarily offered to pay an unusually high price for it P I danot know whether you would class me amongthe sensible men toiwhom you appeal, but I possess the senses of sight and hearing—two most essential requisites to a. frbit not fail ipake good use. of them, so that, frpm _pbeervatipn and experience.! amina position to show that the price offered byTthe lessees for-sdid lands was not an unusually; high price, and it is-only in comparison, . with t£e - ruinously Jow price at which the Provincial Govennhent are offer ng the best lands (20s per acre), and on deferred payments extending oyer ten years, at 30s, that the price • rimed 1 can be considered high;-it To prove my position I will give yon ian- account of three transfers of land, all in this Province, east of Matanra, which recently came under my observation, No.t was a private sale of‘trashy hill land (well knoWn'to the writer) at 50s per acjpr land had been pnrphaaed .from the Government at 20s per acre somo 'two years* previously, and had not bgen .One shiUing Expended in^imprpyepent^ No; was the sale of 'acres of laid of good quality, but rough and ; . .'at L 3 10s per acre, subject to a lease four, years to.run. In this case , there were im- 1 provements to the value"*say of LSOO, the yendor had apumbasing clause in the lease; at L2 10s per acre, so that be-’-cleared 20s 1 per acre without any trouble. ' v . ifyji, ff waS almost the sameas Up. 2. Seine Aflfoo t acres’ were, recently, leased; for seven ■ yetis at 2a 6d per acre, - with a purchasing chutie at .temination of lease at L 3 10s per fcCrd.lljdced, there is such a rush after land the '"Btovinde,. that.-the Govern- *’ dispose Of it from 30s to r M'the abri% attoOTding to quality-’ and posi-; tion. ;At time,- it is hiring squanv tiered, as any, young spendthrift ; without i i . brainfl of experience might do on doming ‘ fine and unencumbered estate. Look at. Canterbury i; There, the price has from the firirtbcmi. double that in Otago,, and yet, J* fb*»-<inr»>-haa-beeD 'to. lbO "I'eady safes , v ‘”' v,s. j think it fa high time' we drew in our S§ riiw, i and stopped the ■prege-.t-. reckless t&tQfSr, and* am inclined tb side with Mr ffdvocatibg the tearing ofrtond b’y £ Of disJMgbf the
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760608.2.21.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4144, 8 June 1876, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
480THE LAND QUESTION. Evening Star, Issue 4144, 8 June 1876, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.