OUR MELBOURNE LETTER.
. !l?he qiUfe aaistilir Atm vSPrI- °/ 1- r 1 har< WBohred^t a’gfcht & b£ -vfctbjtheir, customs)! ajffiL^biiria to have nothing m tfern ’4^..b^& Wo ‘i upon— mares- nestiif smgte step, ih-this buSiieis < has 4 tdehlWcTll#' Trowell's i^ottiafifeb^ Ma\ niter rtantiated. -The detention; » found to be illeff}d, :tbe hbuse tmitißtifiable.'and thechairgoeSußsaifltf against Wilkinson (Stevenson’s; u prettyocrtainto result .in last step is the - most signal imw One, morning the town isws -eleOtrsfied, A jjy : - a >{KNdfeve. ri^tein^ } intim-a* ’ " iaat the^ thattwehe.notfoontemed their value was L3OO or more, 5 length brougftto l^ht. k^tn«ff'mM^M 3 all these fine statements were -ruthlessly de- ■' atroyed; Messrs Stevenson th%» invoice and entry: withttliu, Customs BtamrJ* correspond ■ exactly the value m all was LlO 6s 8d only, andtS // seizure was whotymegal/ ihties would npt give upthe, case,' and after - ‘ l*jng negotiations bnlyjpohsehted to - condition thitltW merchants pa&rtiie duty a second time - this f fepaymaht<j^mg there and'then refunded to them! Jtfo doubt technical legal reastms-layiat ithe bottom^F this veyy cunous proposal but whether that v • be so or not the tote atewdiJto'St audrthuv ! goods, 'released. - h-o trash,*diScoysaWM have been tnade, btit the IhndMg waiti^sifc opening of Messrs StovattdhV goods, nett result ■ stoppage of the trade, hf .the port&h r d a blockpiah the railway sheds with soft goods opened out. i -Perhaps,jthis, is, jyhat Ihe sioner of by SuaSSorCT? - ■■' kequences ” that '** jthafrm’s wonld > sacked. ZdßhHnm -tyjftj»- Vi-V I ■ : • nr) i Kim-*--... '- t^4asS
Mp*xs sit fo Lis photograph, in . order that those wh want to,know what hia personal appearanc Is may satisfy their curiosity by. purchasing cartes. I wonder how a man feels who thui publicfypffers his features for sale ? The application of the Rev. R. 'K. Ewin| for admission to the ministry of the Presby terian ®hurch -of Victoria was heart . by the {Commission of the Assembly, when it was decided 'by a small majo rity to admit him. . Themo&t notice able feature of this case was that the real grounds of'objection' were only how foi the first time revealed. No doubt they are Sood enough, but they oujffit- to have-been onestfy hhd Openly set out at the very first; Or still better,-if the objectors had-met Mi Ewing as a man, and simply said, “Now, for.yoiir oWh eake/ do not press this appHca. tion. If ihall be compelled to reveal sudlf And such matters; so .we give you fair warning”—in all probability hia prudence would have : 'restrained'hiai. But the want of such- frankness' seems to be an inevitable failing in all ecclesiastical proceedings. Hardlydessimportant to, the Presbyteria^tfoigregtetions,' however, ; werd the utterances©!'Mr Stobbs in the debate. By some sidewind the subject of revivals came up, and the reverend gentleman did not hesi tate tojjshow his dislike of them. This, Was frank enough ;- but I doubt whether it was any wiser than his brethren’s timidrfyv Considering how strong are both the convictions and the sympathies evoked by the late religions movements at Home,; and toe-bitter and unscrupulous attacks just now being made on; all. religion by a certain clique here, it does seem to me that it would have -been better, for a % minister ; to avoid scandalizing religions people and delighting the othersi There was no necessity to speak on the snbject at all, and therefore to speak on itvin such;a way seems wanton. But then.Hr Stobbs is “ Broad (Jhurch ” in; his proclivities, and is -going to have a fine new tower ppt tp Lis church. The first fact may explaip, the-character of his sentiments, and the second. (taken as a proof of his popularity) his boldness in uttering.them.. When last I wrote fme “ trough Smyth ” inquiry was-still pending; since then it is over.. The board made a brief report, supporting .toe officers, condemning the accused on all the reafly important charges except that of presenting a false return to Parliament| that he could uptyrith benefit., to the' public., service return •_ to, <feie Mines rßepartineht,. ? and praising -the ; comElainants!, for their ‘manner before the loard.: sAUthis was conveyed in language so studiedly lenient that it excited no very complimentary comment. The Qovern : ment&femcdpuzzledwhatto do. \They hah two Gabinet meetings to; discuss the matter, and still were Undecided, when Smyth cut toe thing short by' resigning. -Everybody thought he was dOne' with. A paragraph itt'-rthe -papers—evidently ‘iu- - spired ’’—very broadly hinting that toe Civil Service as a, whole were experts! to bear the cost i-of .the . complainants’ case (L 700), and" this morning the ’ * Telegraph ’ is nsuaUy r f tilled ;mnce the carter’s receipt wasunearthed) hadfor three days past occuold “room : at the Mihes Office, ahd v was closeted with the Minister continually. Whether/ itoo ■ Minister •.acts -r herein -on lus own responsibility-or with the sanction of toe' ;' Cabinet. )is; of C' ; course as y e t,j,^9Jtnown,,. bat : .,T , fancy . he - : may sMefy* reckon upon, a mauvtis quart d’heure when Parliament 1 meets. There can be no, doubt; - as to what" the glib explanation' will- be—%he r dealing with bid' matters that*' no oiiebut ; “Mr Smith ”* understands” ftc.,: &c.f'afid eqaally little doubt in the mind of any who knows “ Robert Smith ” as to’the value of that explanation^ It i - said of a great painter that he neverwould look at a - baa picture lest his taste Should be vitiated or the correctness of his eye impaired, Let me follow a good* example, andturn from the Berrys to the me ,tolk abopt ladies. At least I don’t mean ab^^^ti(^ - ,.bixt. about their hats. Two sorts are-beidg much worn just new, both perfectly new—both perfectly hideous.., One sort ie a species of pork-pie genus, and is trimmed’with fur; Of course it has hot even* a riidixffentary vestige 'of a brim. For" , objept I. propose; thp Appropriate" naMe r* o• aetriha,'., for the other ’ form T would suggest Pldiychitua lasumi (For of correct pronuhei- - ation Ih§rebv license 1 * 1 aifybbdy ?to spell the kttor *ifhe so please.) As of course aU’-your lady readers will* have from the. name, it is a very ahd is covered all oyer—both, ott the and that looks as if all the sweepings oftoroahtua :*hop: had. been put through . “ Bew^ufyf*devy,” and- then':fastened - or with gluene. It is not a little remarkable; that in general .toe fades; one. wants to see ' most of are) tobe fonnd,violetdike, Hiding under the shade of PFda&fo f while redbairal£?sto!frp?tfeato^ I°3o 80j, much.-; oftheir harshness under those softening shadows, obtrude tbqpiselves ‘With the . more .emphsipis upon " toe eye because surmounted by P. derrina. Such .are toe ways, qf women,; and aqch" are their hats. But ‘Wild as are tlxeir beht both. The prettiest I -have seen ■ was l verily believe modelled' from 'a' saucepan hd that was sent out with Sir John - FrinkIm’s expedition to the North..Pole, got badly nipped between two icebergs, and was brought back by Hr Kane. AR the other bonnets are modelled upon other saucepan lids, its de . voyage* either const-' or pot j damaged .at
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760529.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4135, 29 May 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,143OUR MELBOURNE LETTER. Evening Star, Issue 4135, 29 May 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.