Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT.

This Court sat in the Provincial Wall thin morning ; Judge Bathgate presiding. The sole business was the hearing of several cases of appeal from the Green island Corporation’s assessment for the presentyear, which resulted as follows :—James Irvine’s appeal was allowed at L3O; Robert M'Cracken’s was dismissed; Alexander Kirkland’s allowed at L 24 ; Robert Cowie.s allowed at L 2 5; James Eunciman’s, sec. 8, dismissed; secs. 25 to 38, B A, valued at L 56, altered to LlO, three-roomed house, dismissed; bakery allowed at L 45 ; secs. 1 to 5 assessed at L2O; secs. 11 and 12 at L 30 0; secs Ito 14 BB at L2l ; secs. 25 to 38 Bat Ll6; secs Ito 14 C, at Lls; secs. 25 to 88 C, Ll2; secs. Ito3B D, L2l; secs. Ito 29, L 72.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760510.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 4119, 10 May 1876, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
136

DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4119, 10 May 1876, Page 2

DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4119, 10 May 1876, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert