DISTRICT COURT.
Monday, May I. (Before Judge Bathgate.)
Gillies and Street v. Rich.—His Honor delivered judgment herein, saying that he was of opinion that defendant had identified himself with the purchase of the property in question, and that so far as the plaintiffs were concerned they had a fair claim against him for remuneration for their trouble. As a decision averse to the plaintiffs had previously been given by Mr Mansford, his Honor explained that that opinion had been given with considerable hesitation, and that the evidence adduced was not the same on both occasions. Notice of appeal was given. Waugh v. Welsh.—ln this case, in which plaintiff sued for LISO damages for refusing to allow plaintiff to proceed with the working of a coal mine he leased from defendant, his Honor found there had been a breach of agreement on the latter’s part, and ho assessed the damages at 120, with costs. Notice oi appeal was given.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760501.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4111, 1 May 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4111, 1 May 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in