RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 4071, 14 March 1876, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Monday, Maboh 13. (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., RM.) Macassey v. Wisi was a claim torjJltto 10s, foe aorv ces rend red as editor of Zealand Law Jouranl ’ Mr H iiMtjK tiff; Mr for def-ndant. plaintiff’s evidence, from 1874 to ICTsJMßmdant pr- ssed him to undertake the rdngnill management of the jonrual he to^m issue; and he (Mr Macas>ey) undertowßro'ao' 'a* for a quarter. He denied mo t emphatica.ly that he res,oasibilty or fro* p rtv m the pubication.—Mr G. B. Barton considered Mr Macassey’s charge for the work he had done very rea enable.—The defendant's statement was to the effect that the publication -WaS-AindflPtiUrnn at Mr 11 stinn •

tTT’t Mr Maca sey positively ed tor for the first yea>y and that he (Mr Wise) was t> publish for the first year: that aftei twelve .months the ma’ter should behandrd o\^ t ro a oc>mms»tßß i op^ i ntituMri ■then a-.t as publisjmr.-and that an editor, lo be p. iq a saJary, shuuWbe thou appointed. Only I iQrty-eightrcopies.of jthe jonmuwaro.Bull K /&ai |there was a' loss' <n it of L2Q. SiF'W<^mi« I reserved his dejpsip^ j S yg I i'.MoAi lOVririafrarid | stnnmdhs Vfor f boftf4' sttbpribd.—Defefidafit ritdi ■ ribt Appear, an&an order .forhiifltfr ■pay the nfflOurit Claimed, or go td prisbn'fer ifouiteeu d^. 7 "-*? wr. .w , A. Smith v. T. —Cla'rii, L 6 ss, : balance of amount due for grazing Of :a horse, ; prwsFhoraerand i>M r Harris" i that the plimtfflPii chargeft were CxO’ B ; alad‘ (baV a selt ethfe'fit’ hfrd beeri" dome td hl- . both I s i trie evidence a j v either : way fi .[Triece; was : u° doubt j lamtxff Had not m a ssaigbt- > forward manner. „

Hall: L2 fe After t plamjtiff- and defemlantr evd--dencS "jMiioit wds tSFiM rimbuht claimed, with co ; t^.‘ 4 '