RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
'* i Monday, March 13; . : (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., !; j -$■ Chiaroni v. King,—ln this. case, Jhearlrlßßt week, 1 an action torecoverthe "value of t?vo miirors, wh>ch were bfpught.to, t/whbydlfighdaht in the lighter Aggies/haVtW been Unshipped from the ship Olivei bis warship noW delivered judgment; sayiog that [haylßg Jnspei tad the case and found eomaportiorilof it damaged, whileevidenfce had been adduced that when the case was delivered to defetyfont it was in good- order, and that ou.arrivid in Dunedin it was found to be btOtifc'&flhiSd that the breakage had occurred inthe amgs. Judgment waVgiven for plaintiff-for l Ll6wrth 00-ts. - Mr Harris, who appeared for -defended, gave notice of appeal ' .. Cayersham Hoad Board v. Nicholas Malbhey —Claim of L 7, for rates due .from June $, 1875, to June 2,1876. Mr Stewa’t apbekfed tor plaintiffs,, and: Mr Stoat d^fpndeq,—Mr Stout objected to Mr t-tewiart apfcarinpufap. but prbdncihghis appointment by theßoard. The Board. bemg could- only instruct' its attorney und, f seal. ' The 'Chairman of the Board hereuoondirew up an instruction to Mr Stewart to act on behalf ct the Board.—Bin Worship admitted Mr Stewart ithe authority, ; BoardVasnction but took a note of: MrßUSpt’g objection. ; John Cameron, ; Cletk to the Board, proved that defendant owed, L 7 ks fates - —L6 on his. hotiand Llona stotti"r-MV Stoat moved that Plaintiffs must be nonsuited,/ The time when- the rates were jnade had not been piovedi The Board could otdyrecovef [under seel i n 168 for! rates that' hadvbeen; -thrte noontHs ,due. ; So far as; thp rate-boefcjpvas Concerned the * Ordinance, had nbt'lwien complied with inasmuch as the heading 'was not set out. Jt had, not been proved whether the rate was a general of special rate. If a general rat jit pn'y could be levied, on district or main roads r_.it special, oh roads, within a subdivision. He lusher argued th it the Board’sipower- to the creation of into a ty. in December Ja<t,e--Hii Worship reserved hiscecisibh oniriie law* points for a mying that, ai -as he was .at present adviflea,;he thought the ralebook was defective, in so far as the.raptmh was concerned. ’ v • Tr :
in the following, cases judgment'wss given for plaintiffs by default with "costs :—Youw; v, Blackman, i 8, for a silk M'Lean y. J. Thompson, L 9, ibr work* ami labor done; Anders m and Co. y. Bell, Life Is M, for- wo k -and labor, done.; M'Phe;son v. G-billigan, LA for board nttd lodging; Batterson v. Bees, L 4 2s, on an 10 JJ, : ? f
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760313.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4070, 13 March 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
415RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4070, 13 March 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.