RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Friday, February 25. (Before J. Batbgate, Esq., R.M.)
Spedding v. Holloway. —Claim L jßs. Judgment io th's ca«e w>s given for plaintiff for the amount claime I with < osts. In Speeding v. Dav's, claim L 9 lasd, a similar verdict was given Wright, Ste hecso”, and Co, v, B .rnea and Howde i. Cl'im L 36 15s 2d, balance of account. Judgment w.>s given for p aintiffa by default for the amount cl rimed, witn coats. Davids nv. hlue-kin Good Tempi ir L dge. —Claim Ll7 for painting done Mr Stout appeared for plainriff; Mr Joyce for defendant, who s leaded that the c. ntract for the work had not been completed. (Left sitting.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760225.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4056, 25 February 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
117RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4056, 25 February 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in