SUPREME COURT.
IN BANCO. Wednesday, January 12. (Before Mr. |Justice Williamf?,) His Honor delivered judgment in Malaghan v. Wenkheim discharging the rule, with costs, he being of opinion that the record in its present state did not show that the plaintiff had obtained a judgment to costs; in Cornish v. Heighten, dismissing an appeal from the Resident Magistrate’s Cou't at Tuapeka; in the Education Board of Nelson v. Roberts, overruling the demurrer ; and in Chapman v. Kennedy, an appeal from the District Court, 1 )unedin, upholding the decision of Judge Bathgate. The greater part of the day’s sitting was occupied with the argument of a rule nisi calling on Mr Coroner Hocken to show cause why the inquisition in rc W. Jenkins, as well as the warrant of commitment and all other proceedings under it, should not be quashed, and of the rule calling upon the Governor of the Gaol to show cause why Jenkins should not be released from custody. Mr Haggitt showed cause, and Mr F. Chapman was heard in support of the rules The argument was unconcluded at four o’clock.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760112.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4018, 12 January 1876, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
183SUPREME COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4018, 12 January 1876, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in