RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Friday, Deokubbr 10, (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., R.M.) In the given for the plaintiffs :—Shotover Terrace Com; any t. G. Barnett, claim for calls; Stoddart v. Canning, L 5 12s 61; Wilson v. Elizabeth Q. M. * ompany, i .36, for machinery supplied ; Cook and Muir v. James M‘Donald, I 17 Os 4d, for law charges; W. Cameron v. W. Lloyd. 10s ; M Crowhurst v. Oatneron, claim of L 8 10s plaintiff was nonsuited ; and in Abraham t, Walsh, Lll, l 6s,Jjudgmertjwas gi venjjfor,defendant.
Dr Borrows v. John Fulton was a judgment summons for Ll6. Mr Lewis, for defendant, contended that the Court had no jurisdiction, his client haring been adjudicated a bankrupt. Mr Denniston, for plaintiff, submitted that it was sufficient that judgment should have been given before bankruptcy.—His Worship adjourned the case for a month, and strongly condemned the action of the defendant, in applying part of the money given to him to pay hiis doctor’s bill with, to passing himself through the Bankruptcy Court, which was,-iu.point of fact, a fraud.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18751211.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3993, 11 December 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
175RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3993, 11 December 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in