BENCH AND BAR.
In the course of his argument in Hay and Another v. Hogg and Hutton to-day, Mr Barton made some reference to the jury’s finding, and so drew from the Bench that his argument that the jury could not distinguish between a tenancy of 1.600 a-year for three years, and a tenancy for five years of L 7 per weeks was a ridiculous one and a poor compliment to tie person sitting on the Bench. Later on Mr Barton said, ,! I have to convince your Honor if I can; but it icertaiuly not by insulting the Court that I presume to convince if.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750624.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3848, 24 June 1875, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
105BENCH AND BAR. Evening Star, Issue 3848, 24 June 1875, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in