Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT.

Tuesday, June 22. (Before His Honor Judge Bathgate.) In the case of Kennedy v. Chapman judg meat was delivered to-day. It was an action to recover the value of certain improvements made by the plaintiff as tenant of land belonging to the defendant. For-the defence objection was made under sections 12 and 4 of the Statute of Frauds, but his Honor decided first that notice of such special defence should have been given; and second, that if jfc had been admissible it could not, in the circumstances of the case, have been sustained. His Honor further decided that LU2 13s 9d was due to the plaintiff, and gave judgment in his favor for that amount, together with costs, but without prejudice to any claim the defendant might have against him for arrears of rent.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750622.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3846, 22 June 1875, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
136

DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3846, 22 June 1875, Page 3

DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3846, 22 June 1875, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert