RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 3793, 21 April 1875, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Wednesday, April 21. (Before J. Bathgate, Esq, R.M.)

M. and J. Msenan v. T. Buma.-Claim, L 6 S J, f f r B® odß . Mr Stout appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Harris defended. The goods had been supplied to defendant’s wife when they were not living together ; the parties having lived separate since October last—the wife with another mao. This was the first transaction between plaintiffs and Mrs Burns. -His Worship while admitting the hardship of tno case, said he must give judgment for the amount, defendant not having warned plaintiffs against supplying his wife the goods nor advertising that ho would not be responsiblo for any debts contracted by her. Findlater v, Sterrick.— Claim L 5 10s, for rent due.—Judgment was given by consent, the j“ oun^ to be by monthly instalments of

J. Thomson v. W. B. Smith.-Claim 4s, for balance of wages due. Mr Mouat appeared PlaSff A “i¥f S * Hay defended.Rlaintiff had worked for four days, and he maintamed that he had contracted for 13s a-day, and that defendant had stopped the amount sued for out of the total amount, thinking that as it was so small he would not trouble to go to P Pendantf ®ndant said that plaintiff was only entiUed to I2s per day, and this he had bean P *th t Werß “ P gave i ud ß m ® nt f or plaintiff,