Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Monday, January 11. (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., R.M.)

Drunkenness —David Joy was let off with a caution ; James Wapshott was fined ss. with the alternative of twenty-four hours’ imprisonment; Anne Lockwood LI, of urteen nays’. Obscene Language —John Falser, for using obscene language within the hearing of nersons passing in Howe street, was fined 10s, in default three days’ imprisonment with hard labor. Wife Desertion.—James Walker was charged (on warrant) with deserting his wife, Catherine Walker, at Christchurch on December 15, 1871 —Defendant pleaded not guilty, and said that he was never married to the woman, and in fact did not know who she was.—His Worship ; Did you never go through any mock ceremony’—Defendant (indignantly) ! No; Ido not know her at all.—Snb-li.sne tor Mallard asked, under the circumstances, that the defendant might be again remanded till to-morrow. The police h>d communicated with the Christchurch authorities for instructions, and the reply received was that if defendant paid towards the supnort of his wife and child, that was all that was required ; but iu consequence f h>s plea and denial that the woman was his wife he (<he Su ! -Inspector) had to ask for a remand till next day, in order to receive further instructions from Canterbury. —His Worship suggested that defendant might be remanded to Christchurch, but the SubInspector pointed out that if that course were pursued it would entail considerable expense.—His Worship in adjourning the case till next day said that he would admit the defendant to bail in his own recognizance for L2O, the warrant beingdated as far back as 1871.—Sub-Inspector Mallard could not understand why the warrant had been so long withheld, as it bad only been received in Dunedin on the 4th of the present month.- His Worship thought that defendant might have been traced here ; hence the warrant was sent down.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750112.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3709, 12 January 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
308

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3709, 12 January 1875, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3709, 12 January 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert