SUPREME COURT.
CIVIL SITTINGS. Tuesday, November 3. (Before His Honor Mr Justice Chapman and a Special Jury.) Calderandßellv. Brogden and Another, tout and Barton appeared for plaintiff,; Mr St -wart (Mr >mitli being absent through illne-s) for defendants., Hugh (Jalder, one of the plaintiffs, said he was engaged on the work only part of the time daring which the contract going on, but be knew and c m d vouch f m the correctness of the various ite na in the claim. George Barr C K., coundered from the plan and spi.cifica ioos produced that plain- • iffs were to correct tbo formation— n >t make any oart of the formation. tie had tapped the line a few days ago to ses if the inequalities bad been properly tilled up. William feardou P> avee, contractor, gave similar evidence. He would not consider the additional items for which pbi’nt il’s sued would be included in th : e rntnot for “ correction of the gradient,” up ess specially mentioned. [The taking of evidence hj id not been coa* eluded when we went to : r ]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18741103.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3650, 3 November 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180SUPREME COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3650, 3 November 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in