Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Tuesday, October 13. (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., K.M.)

Drunkenness.— James M'Guire was discharged with a caution; John Love was fined sa, in default twenty-four hours’ impris mment.

obscene Language. —John Gitely was charged on remand with using obscene language in Stafford street.—El,en Dallas sai defendant came to her bouse early on Sun day morning, and used disgusting language “is V\ orship : Yt-ur house is describ d as a brothel—is that not so? Witness denied this, and said that she could get witnesses to confirm her statement. 1 hat was what she wanted to clear up.—His Worship; Are there any girls staying in the house?— Witness: No ; my hou.--e has not been oaaly conducted since I got married some mouths ago.—His Worship : But the woman Gately was there? Witness : Yes ; hut no one goes to my house for an improper purpose. —Defendant said he went to tinhouse to get his wife out of it. He agreed with the police in saying it was a brothel.— Sergeant Anderson said that Dallas’s house was a brothel, and he had seen men and women going into it at all hours.—His Worship said the charge against defendant—that of using indecent and obscene language—had been proved. He thought defendant had received aggravation, and meant to take that i> to account in awarding i uuiahment. If it had bean an ordinary offence he would have sent defendant to gaol for three months, but seeing that he had had some provocation he would only sentence him to sufficient puni-hinent to remind him that in no circumstances must he bre k the law. Defendant was lined Ll, in default six days’ imprisonment with hard labor. Hawker’s License.— Abraham Doodeward applied for a hawker’s license.—His Worsnip said he was very willing to encourage any lawful way of getting a living, but, in granting the license, he must give defendant this caution —that he had been seen upon a race-course, gambling. It depended on his conduct whether he again got a license. He would just jay it down, as a rule, that no honest man gambled ou a racecourse.—Defendant: It was only for goods. —His Worship: But it was against the law.—Defendant: Well, if I had known it was against the law I would not have allowed ijt.—The license was granted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18741013.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3632, 13 October 1874, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
383

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3632, 13 October 1874, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3632, 13 October 1874, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert